Agenda Item No
The Vale of Glamorgan Council
Cabinet Meeting: 29th February 2012
Report of the Cabinet Member for Education and Lifelong Learning
Summary of School Inspection Reports for the Autumn Term 2011.
Purpose of the Report
1. To up-date Members on the results of school inspections under the new framework. For the Autumn Term 2011.
1. That Members note the good work of schools.
Reasons for the Recommendations
1. To develop a shared understanding about the outcomes of school inspections, according to the new arrangements.
2. In September 2010 the new Estyn School Inspection Common Inspection Framework (CIF) was introduced across all schools in Wales.
3. The new CIF introduces some significant changes:
· Only three Key Questions instead of seven;
· Two new overarching judgements;
· More specific reference to the need to promote learner wellbeing in parallel with standards;
· More specific reference for practitioners and school leaders to work with others to secure best practice and hence school improvement.
4. An overview of the CIF is outlined in Appendix 1.
Relevant Issues and Options
5. The following schools inspected during the Autumn 2011 term were: St Illtyd Primary, St Nicholas Primary and Ysgol Maes Dyfan Special School (Appendix 2)
A summary of the investigation findings are appended to this report.
6. The purposes of inspections are to:
· Provide accountability to the users of the services and other stakeholders through public reporting on providers;
· Promote improvement in education and training; and
· Inform the development of national policy by Welsh Government.
7. School inspections are governed by the Education Act 2005 and related regulations. Inspections must be conducted by teams of inspectors, led by a HMI, additional inspector or registered inspector, and must result in a written report. Section 28 of the Education Act 2005, says that inspectors must report on:
· The educational standards achieved by the school;
· The quality of education provided by the school;
· How far education meets the needs of the range of pupils at the school;
· The quality of leadership in and management of the school, including whether the financial resources are managed efficiently;
· The spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils at the school; and
· The contribution of the school to the wellbeing of pupils.
8. During all core inspections, the inspection team will consider whether the school needs any follow-up activity.
9. When conducting school inspections, the main forms of evidence considered are:
· Briefings from local authorities;
· Documentary evidence, including data on pupils' performance and progress;
· Observation of teaching or training sessions and other activities;
· Samples of pupil' work;
· The views of pupils and stakeholders; and
· Discussion with staff, leaders and managers, governors and others.
10. The reporting inspector is responsible for producing a final inspection report that is clear to a lay audience and helpful to the school. In most cases, the main body of the report will be no longer than five pages.
11. The structure of the inspection report is based on two overall summary judgements, three key questions and ten quality indicators and will take the following form:
· Overall judgement on the school's current performance
· Overall judgement on the school's prospect for improvement
Key Question 1: How good are outcomes?
Key Question 2 : How good is provision?
· Learning experiences
· Care, support and guidance
Key Question 3: How good are leadership and management?
· Improving quality
· Partnership working
· Resource management
12. The two overall summary judgements and the judgements for the three key questions and the ten quality indicators will be based on a 4-point scale:
· Excellent - Many Strengths, including significant examples of sector-leading practice
· Good - Many strengths and no important areas requiring significant improvement
· Adequate - strengths outweigh areas for improvement
· Unsatisfactory - Important areas for improvement outweigh strengths
13. During Autumn 2011 the overall judgements achieved by Vale of Glamorgan schools which were inspected were as follows:
Prospects for Improvement
St Nicholas Primary
St Illtyd Primary
Ysgol Maes Dyfan
14. While the responsibility for producing the action Plan rests with the schools, the authority also has a number of key responsibilities. Theses include:-
· Agreeing the Post Inspection Action Plan;
· Ensuring that any issues identified by Estyn relating to the Local Authority are addressed;
· Ensuring that delivery of the action plan is monitored through advisor visits to schools;
· Supporting schools to raise standards through identification and sharing of good practice.
15. In all instances the Directorate of Learning and Development will work with schools to ensure an effective and robust action plan is developed to build upon areas of strengths and to address and identified shortcomings.
Resource Implications (Financial and Employment and Climate Change, if appropriate)
16. Follow-up activity for schools placed in a category will be resourced through the School Improvement Service.
Legal Implications (to Include Human Rights Implications)
Crime and Disorder Implications
Equal Opportunities Implications (to include Welsh Language issues)
19. Welsh medium schools undergo school inspections by Estyn according to the same Common Inspection Framework, but through the medium of Welsh
20. This report supports the Council's corporate objectives for Education and Lifelong Learning and the priorities identified in Education 2015.
21. This report supports the objectives listed in the Service Plan for School Improvement 2011/2012
Policy Framework and Budget
22. The recommendations in this report are within the existing policy framework and budget.
Consultation (including Ward Member Consultation)
23. Not applicable.
Relevant Scrutiny Committee
24. Lifelong Learning.
Estyn Inspection Guidance Reports September 2010
Head of School Improvement Service
Jane McCarthy, Estyn Inspector and Literacy Adviser for School Improvement Service
John Comissiong, Estyn Inspector and Numeracy Adviser for School Improvement Service
Jendy Hillier, Estyn Inspector and Strategy Team leader for Curriculum Development, School Improvement Service
Director of Learning and Development