State of the Area Debate 2006, Barry
REPORT of the State of the Area Debate held on
6th April, 2006 at Barry Memorial Hall.
Present:
|
Councillor Ms. M.E. Alexander
|
(Mayor, Vale of Glamorgan Council)
|
|
Councillor H.J.W. James
|
(Leader, Vale of Glamorgan Council)
|
|
Councillor A.D. Hampton
|
(Cabinet Member: Education and Lifelong
Learning)
|
|
Councillor A.C. Williams
|
(Cabinet Member, Social and Care Services)
|
|
Councillor M.R. Harvey
|
(Cabinet Member: Regeneration, Tourism and
Leisure)
|
The Mayor welcome all present to the debate,
which would focus on the Council’s key achievements and ongoing
major projects within Barry. The planned series of
presentations would be followed by a question and answer session
and members of the audience would be offered an opportunity to ask
general questions in an open forum prior to the end of the
debate.
The Mayor invited the Leader of the Council to
provide his opening address. The Leader referred to the key
topics, which would form the basis of the Cabinet Members’
presentations for the evening:
·
County Library - Councillor A.D. Hampton
·
Hub - Multi Use Facility - Councillor A.C. Williams
·
Waterfront Proposals - Phase 2 and Entrepreneurship Centre -
Councillor M.R. Harvey
The Leader advised that Barry was the venue
for the third State of the Area Debate of 2006. The first had
been held in Llantwit Major on 22nd March, 2006 and the
second in Penarth on 29th March, 2006. The focus
for each State of the Area Debate had been to concentrate on the
improvements and developments to date in each of the town areas
within the Vale.
The Leader then provided the meeting with an
overview of the Council stating that the Council’s executive
decision making body, the Cabinet, consisted of 10 Members and the
Council had four Scrutiny Committees whose role was to scrutinise
the executive decisions of the Cabinet and to make any
recommendations for improvement of service. He referred to
the fact that the Council had adopted the principal of continuous
improvement and that most of the Council’s services had improved.In
particular, he advised the audience, a recent article in the
Western Mail had stated the Council was the top in Wales. He
further stated that the new Cabinet style of decision-making had
not only produced more open and accountable local government but
also achieved quicker decision-making, which was clearly in the
public interest. Council services had improved over the last
five years and the Leader suggested that most people had seen some
improvement in the range of services within their locality which
included road resurfacing, grass cutting, litter collection and
recycling arrangements and the Vale of Glamorgan had established a
target to recycle 40% of all household waste.
Progress in relation to the OneVale One Stop
Shop Contact Centre was ongoing, the Scheme itself was estimated to
spend £14,000,000 which would provide a more customer focussed
service for which the budget had already been set aside.
The Leader closed his address by stating that
the Auditors Report on the Vale of Glamorgan had provided key
messages stating that the Corporate Management arrangements
operating within the Vale were operating effectively and the
overall financial position was strong. The Auditor had
reported in November 2005 that “the Council made steady progress in
2004/05 and was well placed and maintained”. The Leader
reaffirmed the Cabinet’s and the Council’s determination to
continue improvements throughout the Vale.
A New Library for Barry - Councillor
A.D. Hampton - Cabinet Member for Education and Lifelong
Learning
Councillor Hampton opened his presentation by
describing the elements of the Scheme, which comprised:
· a
new town square
· a
revitalised Central Park
· a
flagship library and gallery space.
The library would be the first large town
centre library to be built in Wales within the past 10 years and
would be one of the very few civic buildings present where people
could meet, spend time and relax as well as access a wide range of
services. The library would be housed in the new two storey
extension being built behind the Town Hall, with its main entrance
on Tynewydd Road and had been designed with large areas of glass
along both sides of the extension with the aim of making it a light
and open structure.
Councillor Hampton presented views of the
building from the car park on Wyndham Street, which showed the
library courtyard at the rear, which will be accessible from both
the library and gallery spaces.
The audience were shown an architects
impression of the interior of the library, which emphasised:
·
the attractive book displays and promotions that wouldl encourage
visitors to try something new
·
the children’s area which would have a book den for younger
readers, space for arts and craft activities and a range of audio
visual and computer facilities
·
the youth area, designed to appeal to young teenagers which will
have information resources, internet access and a CD listening
section
·
the relaxation area on the ground floor which will have comfortable
seating, a coffee machine, newspapers and magazines
·
the collections of special resources including large print books,
audio books, resources for the hearing impaired, magnification
equipment for the visually impaired and a text to speech
scanner.
The first floor of the library would be a
quieter place than the ground floor and will be where most of the
book stock will be housed. Two community rooms will also be
provided for use by community groups and community learning
providers. A separate computer suite will accommodate the
programme of computer based classes that now take place in the open
library.
Finally, Councillor Hampton advised that the
library would open during the autumn of this year.
Partnership Development with Barry
YMCA “The Hub” - Councillor A.C. Williams (Cabinet Member for
Social and Care Services)
Councillor Williams opened his presentation by
informing that the project cost of The Hub had been funded
from:
·
European Funding
·
Local Regeneration Fund
·
Vale of Glamorgan Council
·
Big Lottery Fund
·
Welsh Assembly
·
Dow Corning
·
WDA
and had created a multi-purpose community
enterprise centre, which encouraged participation in sport,
lifelong learning and arts. It provided a supportive
environment which included the most vulnerable and disadvantaged
members of its community.
The title of “The Hub” had been chosen to
reflect its position at the centre of an integrated range of
services including health, therapies, social care, sports,
educational and personal support services.
The new premises were extensions to the YMCA’s
existing building at Court Road and made use of a large plot of
derelict land owned by the Vale Council. The premises had
opened in January 2006.
The building had eight main themes which
helped to provide a highly interactive and supportive environment
which involved the whole community. A community café was at
the hub of the building and was located close to the reception
area.
There were opportunities for dedicated play
and training events for children and young people, and the very
youngest children were cared for in a stimulating environment
within the facility. This enabled parents to participate in
the activities on offer.
A purpose built Social Services day care
facility for those with higher dependency needs had been
established within the building which provided a secure and
protective environment for the most vulnerable whilst enabling them
to interact at the heart of their community.
The Hub provided flexible office space for
charitable and voluntary groups. Virtually all the
accommodation had been taken up. The Hub also provided
expanded facilities to enable a wider variety of fitness and
leisure classes to be offered for all levels and abilities.
Changing facilities had been expanded and improved to reflect the
need for family friendly facilities.
Training courses were accessible to all of the
community. Employment skills training for young people and
classes for people with disabilities would encourage wider
participation in learning opportunities.
A new dedicated multi-purpose performance
space allowed for community dance and drama workshops and may
enable small-scale productions to taken place at the centre.
An important element of the building comprised
the dedicated training suite. This enabled local residents
and voluntary groups to make use of the facility to expand the
capacity of the whole community to engage in new skills.
Councillor Williams concluded by stating that
the Council was justly proud to have participated in the
development of The Hub. The investment would prove very
valuable to the people of the Vale of Glamorgan and it was now up
to those people to make The Hub the wonderful Centre it deserved to
be.
The Waterfront, Barry (Phase 2) -
Councillor M.R. Harvey (Cabinet Member - Regeneration, Tourism and
Leisure)
Councillor Harvey gave a presentation
which:
·
set the context of the Waterfront, Barry project and the need for
mixed uses in this important regeneration project
·
outlined the Innovation Quarter, an example of a mixed use
development project being delivered by the Council and Welsh
Assembly Government in the heart of the Waterfront
·
reported on the progress of an existing new flagship Council scheme
in the Innovation Quarter called the Entrepreneurship Centre.
The Waterfront extended some 190 acres around
the enclosed waters of the No. 1 Dock and involved the
redevelopment of primarily derelict brown-field land.
Outline planning permission was granted in
1994 for retail, commercial, residential, leisure, recreation and
education uses plus new open spaces.
It was an ambitious project that has been
implemented by a joint venture between ABP and the WDA with the
Council also assisting with various projects.
In terms of progress a great deal has been
achieved in the Waterfront since March 1996 when ABP and the WDA
commenced the first major land reclamation works.
Extensive land reclamation has been completed,
new roads constructed, large areas have been landscaped and a new
walkway or promenade has been completed by ABP and the WDA.
The Council and WDA have also assisted by
delivering in the late 1990s the strategic road links to the
Waterfront of the Gladstone Road Bridge and the section of Ffordd y
Mileniwm adjacent the No. 2 Dock. Furthermore, to demonstrate
its commitment to the Waterfront, the Council has purchased and
occupied the Docks Office, and is a partner with the WDA in
developing the Innovation Quarter.
The private sector has responded by investing
in the Waterfront with over 600 new homes built by national house
builders, and new retail developments such as Morrisons superstore,
Focus, Argos.
The Council was keen to see the Waterfront
accommodate a wide range of mixed uses and does not want it to be
overly developed by housing. Mixed use developments are
favoured because they add activity and choice of places to work,
live and visit. They reduce the need to travel and make towns
safer for people both day and night.
There was therefore a need for a balanced
development in the Waterfront with tourism, leisure and community
uses to balance the residential uses. However, achieving
mixed uses is a challenge and can be limited by the property market
and the availability of public funding.
Within this context the Council is actively
encouraging these mixed uses by firstly continuing to meet with ABP
and WDA/WAG representatives regarding progressing the second phase
of the Waterfront, and encouraging mixed uses within the remainder
of the Waterfront. Secondly, the Council is itself delivering
on 19 acres of its land in the Waterfront a mixed use development
called the Innovation Quarter in partnership with the WDA/WAG and
thirdly, by establishing Council offices in the Waterfront at the
Docks Office it is aimed to encourage other uses.
Councillor Harvey referred to the Innovation
Quarter, a development project being implemented by the Council and
WDA with the primary aim of delivering mixed uses in the heart of
the Waterfront.
The Innovation Quarter is located in the heart
of the Waterfront close to the High Street/Broad Street retail
area.
Today, the only remaining historic buildings
on the site were the Grade II listed Hydraulic Pumphouse building
and the former railway goods shed building adjacent Hood road
providing important references to the history of the site and
creating a strong sense of place.
The Council was working in partnership with
the WDA/WAG to develop the Innovation Quarter and our aim is to
establish a new Urban Quarter with a strong sense of place and a
lively mix of learning, employment, tourism, community and leisure
uses balanced with some residential if necessary.
The projects in the indicative master plan
include: the Council’s recently completed Skills Training Centre,
an Entrepreneurship Centre - a Council project which is now on site
the completed Phases 2 and 3 of the Heritage Steam Railway; a
proposed medical centre - the subject of advanced negotiations, a
live/work project with some residential which is at feasibility
stage. Consideration is also being given to restoring the
Pumphouse and identifying potential uses for this landmark building
and the Hood Road Goods Shed building and site has been restored
and provides further development opportunity for mixed uses along
with a venue for hosting events.
Looking to the near future, the Council’s
commitment to encouraging mixed uses is demonstrated by a new
project currently on site - the Entrepreneurship Centre
development.
The aims of the Entrepreneurship Centre
project are:
(a) to
provide improved local access to business support services by
offering a single reception service with on site advice,
information and support (including seminar and meeting facilities)
to local businesses in Barry and the Vale
(b) to
offer high quality incubator units for rent for new start fledgling
businesses with exceptional needs or merit. Priority will be
given to good quality businesses
(c)
to complement the other ongoing and proposed mixed uses at the
Innovation Quarter.
The aims are also:
(d) to
create a prominent 2 storey building promoting high design
standards, characterised by contemporary architecture with the
design and material aimed at reinforcing a strong sense of place
with design cues taken from the Hydraulic Pumphouse and Goods
Shed.
(e) to
create a building offering 1500 sq m of floor space with a high
quality work environment provided 8 workshops and 15 offices,
served by a main foyer with a single reception and on site
parking.
In terms of progress, the design team led by
architects Austin Smith Lord were appointed in August 2004. The
contract was let to interserve in July 2005. The project will
cost an estimated £1.9 million and is funded by a cocktail of
funding from the WDA, Local Regeneration Fund from WAG, ERDF and
Council funds.
The Entrepreneurship Centre is due to be
completed by June 2006 and open later this calendar year.
The following question and answer session then
ensued:
|
Question
|
Answer
|
|
Councillor Mrs. S. Hodges - Town Council
expressed pleasure at the existence of the gallery space within the
new library and asked what would be located there?
|
Councillor Hampton responded by stating that
the Chief Librarian was considering in detail what would be located
within the gallery space, but in broad terms in would comprise
rooms for community use and a reference section. The project
was on schedule to be completed by July.
The Leader added that the old library area had
been retained for multi-use exhibitions etc. An officer team
was to start considering ways in which this area could interact
with the library and public engagement would be sought.
The new library would increase the number of
people coming into Barry to use the shops.
|
|
Tracey Marsh - I don’t appreciate being told
that the plans for the gallery space within the new library are not
yet finalised.
|
Councillor Hampton responded by stating that
the new library represented a very large project and comprised many
different parts. Discussions had already been held with
community groups.
|
|
Mr. R. ??? referred to the lack of facilities
for residents within the Waterfront development
|
Councillor Harvey responded that an area of
the Waterfront had been allocated for the provision of a
restaurant. A developer had submitted plans for such a
facility but the design had been rejected by the Planning
Authority.
It must be appreciated that the Council itself
could not build entertainment facilities but could only encourage
others to develop.
|
|
Brian Osborne enquired:
(1) When
will UWIC develop the former holiday site at Barry Island?
(2) What
are the Council’s plans for Phase 2 of the Waterfront development
i.e. West Point?
Mr. Osborne expressed the view that the
Council was involved in too many initiatives and was frightening
investors away from the area.
|
(1)
Councillor Harvey stated that the Council was making every effort
to encourage UWIC to develop at Barry Island. However, at
present UWIC was subject to much reorganisation and was reviewing
its Estate Plan. The Council was prepared to make a
contribution towards the development but the decision was,
ultimately, a matter for UWIC.
The Leader added that UWIC had recently
reaffirmed its decision to develop the site at Barry Island but was
experiencing a funding gap.
(2) With
regard to West Pond, Councillor Harvey replied that no definite
uses had been planned, although the Council intended to continue
the road through to Barry Island. £40 million of public money
had been spent on the area, which had generated a further £100
million.
|
|
Mr. ?? The money being spend on the
steam railway is not justified in view of the railway’s operation
of just 12 hours per week.
|
Councillor Harvey stated that the railway was
not operated by the Council and was financed by the Wales Tourist
Board. It had recently been announced that the latest Phase
had been approved which would allow the railway line to be extended
to the Morrison’s Store.
The Leader stated that the railway line was
not operated solely for tourism purposes but also for community
regeneration.
The Leader further reminded those present that
the Waterfront area had been derelict up to only a few years ago.
The Council wished the Waterfront to be a vibrant area and
had the determination to ensure that this became a reality.
|
|
Margaret Council asked about the lack of
provision of public toilets within the Vale
|
The Leader replied by stating that the new
Central Library would contain manned public toilets.
He also said that good public toilets were key
to attracting visitors and that all toilets needed to be
improved.
Generally, toilets within the Vale had been
closed because they were vandalised, but the Cabinet had asked for
a complete review of the public toilets within the Vale.
|
|
?? enquired about the state of Holton
Road.
|
The Leader agreed that the area needed to be
improved and stated that progress can take time.
The closure of the Dan Evans store had not
involved the Council, but had been taken as a commercial
decision.
The Council had purchased the land on which
the Wilkinson Store had been built.
The Council wished to acquire the site of the
Seamen’s Mission for use as a car park.
These attempts by the Council to improve the
area had all taken time, although the Council was investing huge
sums in Barry.
In addition, the Council had asked Welsh Water
to contribute towards the costs of repaving Holton Road.
Holton Road will also be re-surfaced to the
same high quality as King Square.
|
|
?? stated that it would be better to spend
£2.50 and go to Bridgend for the shopping experience
|
|
|
Mary Nichola Weaver enquired if the Council
would be prepared to re-establish a Focus Group to establish
whether the Council Tax payers were obtaining value for money.
|
The Leader responded that Focus Groups already
existed in the form of citizen’s panels and the Council also
conducted annual attitude surveys.
The evidence suggested that services were
improving, although there was still room for improvement, as
evidenced by the publication of the Council’s Performance
Indicators.
|
|
Jim Davies referred to earlier comments about
the cost of the new “telephone system” being £14 million and
enquired how much this represented per head of population.
|
The Leader replied by stating that it was not
a telephone system. The new system would involve Business
Process, re-managing the existing way of working. The new
OneVale Contact Centre would be manned not by telephonists but by
people who would be able to deal immediately with any matter.
These people would be highly trained and recruitment had already
commenced. Part of the package would be a procurement system
which would generate savings of £1 million per year.
The new system would transform the way in
which the Council dealt with the public.
|
|
Graham Hawkins asked how much longer the
public had to put up with an ever increasing Council Tax.
|
The Leader agreed that Council Tax had
increased every year, and expressed the view that it always
would. The question that should have been asked was why has
Council Tax increased by a higher rate than inflation and stated
that the answer to the question lay in the recent Council Tax
re-banding exercise.
|
|
Mr. ?? of Jewel Street stated that he was
paying over £100 per year towards the police and asked what he was
getting for his money.
|
The Leader invited Inspector Evans to
reply.
Inspector Evans assured those present that the
police were active in the community. Every ward area of the
Council had a dedicated police officer and the Castleland ward in
which Jewel Street lay had been allocated four police officers and
a sergeant.
|
|
Jim Brain referred to recent press reports
which stated that the Vale had spent £1.8 million on
consultants. Why couldn’t the Council’s own officials do this
work?
|
The Leader explained that some aspects of the
Council’s work involved the limited use of expertise that was not
normally available within the Council’s workforce. In such
cases, the Council purchased the expertise required.
The Leader also stated that the terms
‘consultant’ was misleading as it also referred to professional
expertise and project management work.
|
|
?? of Barry Island asked if there was any good
news regarding the steps at the Waterfront.
|
Councillor Harvey reported that construction
of the new steps was imminent.
The Leader added that the decision by ABP to
allow the new steps to be built had arisen as a result of public
pressure.
|
|
Mr. B. West of Dinas Powys referred to the
Council being reluctant to spend “£400 per week” on residential
care for the elderly but being prepared to spend “£4000 per week”
to send children to special schools
|
The Leader advised that the Council is often
faced with difficult choices. Situations sometimes arise
whereby children have to be removed from their parents, sometimes
into specialist care, the costs of which could be £4000 per week in
certain circumstances. The Council had no choice but to pay
the fees, but was looking to form a cartel of several Councils in
an attempt to control the level of fees.
With regard to Community Services, the Leader
stated that he was aware that everything that is done will have an
effect on someone’s life. The Council faced challenges with
the provision of children and adult services, and the Leader
expressed a desire to work with the private sector to establish 3/5
year agreements. This could help to reduce the Council’s
overspend and thereby reduce Council Tax bills and it provides some
certainty of funding for the owners of the residential homes for
the elderly.
|
|
Mr. ?? - I do appreciate that the Council is
underfunded but may I bring to your attention the state of the
roads in the Vale. It is best to re-surface roads rather than
plug the gaps.
|
The Leader agreed. The Council had
received monies from the Welsh Assembly Government in the past for
road maintenance, but had received nothing for the past two
years. This did not mean that the Council had done nothing -
in fact the Council had made significant investments and had set
aside a sum of £350,000 this year and £500,000 next.
Furthermore, Highway Authorities in South
Wales had made representations to Welsh Assembly Government
Ministers to identify the costs of bringing the roads in the area
up to a good standard. The cost had been identified as £80
million spread over the next five years, but the Vale of Glamorgan
Council had yet to be awarded any additional resources.
|
|
Mike ? of Barry suggested that a link road
from Barry to Junction 34 of the M4 was required.
|
The Leader agreed that there was a pressing
need for a Culverhouse Cross relief road. The Council had
requested funds from the Welsh Assembly Government year after year
but had recently been advised by WAG not to submit any further
requests.
The Welsh Assembly Government had employed its
own consultants to look at ways to alleviate the traffic problems
and had been presented with three suggestions:
Short-term solution would be the trunking of
the A48 between St. Nicholas and Sycamore Cross.
Medium-term solution would be a peripheral
road to the top of the Tumble.
The longer-term solution would be a link road
to Junction 34 of the M4.
The Leader added that, should the proposals
for a defence college at St. Athan proceed then the need for the
longer-term solution would become more pressing.
|
|
Jean Simpson spoke of traffic congestion in
Robin’s Lane and asked if it was a condition of planning
applications that off-road parking be provided.
|
The Leader stated that all planning
application are considered by officers of the Traffic Section who
will make appropriate comments.
The Council owned a property in Robin’s Land
which does have off-road parking.
As the Leader was not familiar with the
specific area being referred to, he offered to provide a written
response to Ms. Simpson.
|
|
Mike Stuart of Barry enquired as to whether
the flagship developments i.e. The Hub and new library together
with the Waterfront developments had been constructed with
conservation issues in mind.
|
In response, the Leader advised that in all
developments the architects had been briefed to develop proposals
that were “sustainable for the future”.
Furthermore, all buildings are constructed to
current building standards.
|
The Mayor then invited the Leader to sum
up.
The Leader thanked all present for attending
the Debate which had proved challenging.
The Leader expressed disappointment at the
number of attendees, but thanked those who were present for their
attendance. However, he thanked those who had attended for
their questions.
The Mayor ended the meeting by thanking the
Leader, Cabinet Members, staff and all members of the public for
attending what she considered to be a productive evening.