AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

 

MINUTES of a meeting held on 3rd July, 2007.

 

Present:  Councillor A.D. Dobbinson (Vice-Chairman); Councillors Ms. L. Burnett, J. Clifford, E. Hacker, Mrs. M. Kelly Owen and C.L. Osborne.

 

Also present: Richard Harries of the Wales Audit Office. 

 

 

182   APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE-

 

These were received from Councillor N.P. Hodges.

 

 

183   MINUTES -

 

RECOMMENDED - T H A T the minutes of the meeting held on 14th May, 2007 be approved as a correct record.

 

 

184   DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST -

 

No declarations were received.

 

 

185   REGULATORY PLAN 2006/07 (REF) -

 

The above Plan was produced annually by the Wales Audit Office and was the product of careful negotiation between the Council’s Relationship Manager and the other regulators of services. 

 

The Regulatory Plan 2006/07 was considered by Cabinet on 23rd May, 2007 at which it was

 

RESOLVED -

 

(1)    T H A T the Regulatory Plan for 2006/07 be endorsed.

 

(2)    T H A T the Regulatory Plan for 2006/07 be referred to the Audit Committee for consideration.

 

Audit Committee, having considered the Regulatory Plan for 2006/07,

 

RECOMMENDED - T H A T the Regulatory Plan for 2006/07 be endorsed.

 

 

186   WALES AUDIT OFFICE - REGULATORY PLAN PROGRESS REPORT 2006/07 (DFICTP) -

 

Committee were advised of progress made by the Wales Audit Office, as the Council’s appointed external auditors, in respect of the Regulatory Plan 2006/07. 

 

Attached at Appendix A to the report was an update on the progress made to date (as at 18th June, 2007) against the 2006/07 Regulatory Plan.  This set out for each area of the financial accounts work and performance and inspection work, the respective risks and key questions to be answered.  Much of the work was either ongoing or had yet to commence and the status of each action to date was reflected in the comments and next steps sections of the report.

 

It was reported that a further Progress Report would be brought before the Committee in September 2007.

 

RECOMMENDED - T H A T the progress report on the Regulatory Plan be noted.

 

Reason for recommendation

 

So that proper scrutiny of the Regulatory Plan can take place.

 

 

187   RISK MANAGEMENT - CORPORATE RISK REGISTER REVIEW - INTERIM REPORT (DFICTP) -

 

Committee received the preliminary results of the review and rationalisation of the Corporate Risk Register for consideration pending further update following the finalisation of the Service Plans for 2007/08. 

 

The Council’s existing Risk Management Strategy and Corporate Risk Register  had been approved by the Cabinet on 10th May, 2006.  The Strategy set out the methodology  for assessing and scoring Corporate risks, both in terms of their magnitude (impact) and likelihood (probability).  It included an expanded risk assessment matrix to allow a more accurate profile to be developed for each risk.

 

Responsibility for co-ordinating future reviews now lay with the Corporate Risk Management Group (CRMG).  The nominated risk owners in conjunction with members of the CRMG had now reviewed existing Corporate risks.  The preliminary results had been subject to detailed scrutiny by the Group as a whole.

 

The resulting revised Corporate Risk Register following the review was attached as Appendix A to the report.  The initial results of the review had seen a reduction in the number of Corporate Risks from 19 to 13.  Certain risks (culture leadership and vision, democratic renewal, customer consultation and engagement, performance management and asset management) had now reduced due to the counter measures taken and were deemed appropriate for inclusion in the relevant Service Plans rather than the Corporate Risk Register.  

 

No new Corporate Risks had been added at this stage although there had been changes in the definition and description of some risks to take account of changes in circumstances and the evolving nature of the risks.  In addition, the former risks associated with Recruitment and Retention and Capacity and Skills had been merged to form a new risk (Workforce Planning). 

 

In a number of cases the risk profiles had increased / decreased purely as a result of the application of the new risk assessment matrix, which now reflected a more accurate position for the risk.  Others, however, had changed because of an increase / decrease in:

 

-       the factors that made up the risk

-       the impact or likelihood of the risk occurring

-       the controls currently in place to manage the risk

-       the countermeasures required to improve the management of the risk (including adherence to pre-determined time scales for completion).

 

Risks which fell into the latter category and where a perceived increase in risk had been determined were as follows:

 

-       business continuity

-       collaboration

-       information management

-       project management

-       funding

-       efficiencies.

 

As part of the service planning process for 2007/08 developed by the Improvement and Development Team, a number of the new Corporate Risk definitions were now considered within each Service Plan as a cross-cutting risk.  These, together with the existing analysis of service risks undertaken would establish a clear link between the Corporate and Service Risk process both in terms of a more accurate assessment of the scoring of the magnitude and likelihood of Corporate Risks as well as identifying any possible emerging Corporate Risks.

 

The analysis of this information would be greatly assisted by the development of a service planning data base by the IDT.  It was therefore proposed that the results of the service planning exercise for 2007/08 be used to further inform the initial Corporate Risk Register results and a further report be submitted to the Audit Committee in due course.

 

RECOMMENDED -

 

(1)    T H A T the interim report on the review of the Corporate Risk Register be noted.

 

(2)    T H A T the results of the service planning exercise for 2007/08 be used to further inform the initial Corporate Risk Register results and that a further report be submitted to the Audit Committee.

 

Reasons for recommendations

 

(1&2)  To further integrate risk management into the culture of the Council.