AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

MINUTES of a meeting held on 26th September, 2007.

 

Present:  Councillor N.P. Hodges (Chairman); Councillors Ms. L. Burnett, J. Clifford, E. Hacker, Mrs. M. Kelly Owen and C.L. Osborne.

 

Also Present: Mr. R. Harries and Ms. G. Lewis (Wales Audit Office).

 

 

367     APOLOGY FOR ABSENCE -

 

This was received from Councillor A.D. Dobbinson.

 

 

368     MINUTES -

 

RECOMMENDED - T H A T the minutes of the meeting held on 26th July, 2007 be approved as a correct record.

 

 

369     DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST -

 

No declarations were received.

 

 

370     AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - REPORTING TO THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE (DFICTP) -

 

The Statement of Accounts had been approved by the Council on 27th June, 2007.  The report of the Wales Audit Office (WAO) to those charged with governance following the audit of the Council’s Financial Statements for 2006/07 (undertaken in accordance with the International Standard on Auditing  (ISA 260)) was appended to the report, as was the amended version of the 2006/07 Statement of Accounts following the audit.

 

The provisional findings of the WAO on the audit of the Financial Statements were:

 

·             There were no concerns with the qualitative aspects of the Council’s accounting practices and financial reporting;

·             There were no uncorrected misstatements;

·             There were no expected modifications to the standard auditor’s report;

·             The audit did not identify any material weaknesses in internal control;

·             There were no other matters which needed to be reported as required by other ISAs; and

·             There were no other audit matters of governance interest to report.

 

Ms. Lewis in commenting on the document,  commended the officers of the Council for the high standard of work undertaken during the exercise and that the Council should be pleased with the findings of the report.  In addition, she commented on Appendix 2 of the report which related to a letter of representation regarding Single Status and to equal pay matters.  The Council had undertaken an exercise to identify whether a potential liability existed by undertaking a review of its bonus schemes and obtained advice from its Legal Department as to whether any differences in remuneration of similarly related posts were related to the gender of the postholders and whether the Council could be liable for claims under Equal Pay legislation.  This exercise had been concluded and the Council was able to defend such claims in accordance with FRS12 (Provisions, Contingents Liabilities and Contingent Assets), any transfer of economic benefits required to settle any liability was not probable.  She commented that in view of this, the Council had made no provision to include arrangements within its accounts.

 

In addition to the above matters, Mr. Harries referred to the Summary of Corrections to the draft Financial Statements.  Those amendments of greater significance were detailed as follows:

 

·             Debtors had been increased by £407k. as bad provisions in regard to housing benefits and sundry debtors were overstated.  The Council’s year end deficit had reduced as a result of this amendment;

·             Debtors had been over-provided within the draft accounts by £148k;

·             A provision of £2.5m. had been included within the revised Financial Statements in regard to the probable repayment of grant funding to the WAG in respect of the Penarth Headland Link scheme.  The provision had been funded by a transfer from a specific reserve that had been earmarked for this eventually, thus this adjustment had a neutral impact on the Council’s general reserves;

·             The insurance provision had been reduced by £678k.  There had however, been no impact on the Council’s year end position as the reduction had been transferred to the earmarked insurance reserve;

·             Fixed assets had been reduced by £2.1m. in regard to the revaluation of the capitalised expenditure upon Penarth Headland Link within infrastructure assets;

·             A creditor of £114k. had been reversed as it was identified on the audit that no liability existed.  This had resulted in a decrease in the reported year end deficit;

·             As a result of the Audit it had been identified that the Council had overpaid water rates to Welsh Water.  A debtor of £34k. had been set up within the HRA in regard to this matter and the income recognised within the HRA Income and Expenditure Account resulting in an increase of HRA reserves;

·             With the Post Ballot Sheet Events references had also been updated in recognition of the recent flood damage caused to Council owned assets.

 

It was also noted that the Contingent Liability note contained within the Financial Statement had also been updated to reflect matters regarding Equal Pay issues.

 

RECOMMENDED - T H A T the report of the WAO on the Audit of the Council’s Financial Statements for the period 2006/07 including the  Letters of Representation that had been incorporated into the Financial Statements following the Audit (Appendices 1 & 2) be endorsed and signed by those authorised.

 

 

371     INTERNAL AUDIT PLAN QUARTER 1 ACTUAL OUTTURN V PLANNED OUTTURN 2007/08 (DIFICTP) -

 

The actual position for the first quarter of the current financial year compared against the Plan was detailed in the Appendix to the report.

 

The Plan had been based on an establishment of 18 full time employees which provided for a total of 4,680 days.  In addition, and included within the Plan of Work for 2007/08 were 60 days for the bought in services of an IT Specialist Auditor making a total of 4,740 days available for the year.

 

It had been noted that the Section had started the year with 3 posts vacant and as a consequence there had been a shortfall of 200 days in the first quarter.

 

Attached as Appendix A was the activities report produced from the Audit Management System (APACE).  In addition, details were provided of the reviews commenced and not completed during the period as well as those reviews completed within the period.

 

Overall the reviews undertaken during the first quarter of the financial year had not identified any significant weaknesses in the system of internal financial control with the exception of Llansannor Primary School.  However, due to the number of control weaknesses identified, it was the intention to revisit the school during the third quarter of the current financial year.

 

Auditors will continue to monitor progress against improvements needed at the Leisure Centres and were in the process of completing the most recent follow-up reviews which would be reported to the next meeting of the Committee.

 

RECOMMENDED - T H A T the report on actual audit performance for the first quarter be noted.

 

 

372     PURCHASING CARDS IN THE VALE OF GLAMORGAN COUNCIL (DFICTP) -

 

A spend analysis carried out in 2005 had identified that the Council processed nearly 80,000 invoices per year which were worth under £100.  Every year over 50,000 invoices were process for values of under £50 which amounted to less than 2% of total expenditure.

 

It had been estimated by the National Audit Office and the National eProcurement project that a saving of between £28 and £33 per transaction could be made by using technology to change procurement processes.

 

The Welsh Procurement Card (WPC) was a cost effective way of purchasing low value, high volume goods and services.  The card was intended to speed up the procurement processes by eliminating the need for requisitions, purchase orders, invoice processing and payments.  The card itself operated in the same way as normal charge cards; insomuch as they were issued to individuals who could use them over the telephone, internet and/or in person.  Cabinet at its meeting held on 16th November, 2005 (Minute No. C2175 refers), approved the introduction of the WPC Mastercard on a phased basis.

 

An internal Audit had been undertaken to review the Corporate Procurement Card pilot scheme (Chief Executive’s Department and the Finance, ICT and Property Directorate) with the purpose of ensuring that appropriate financial systems and controls were satisfactory and that the financial procedures and processes complied with the Council’s Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders.  The result of the internal Audit concluded that the scheme was performing satisfactorily.  The overall findings were positive and it was suggested that the scheme be progressed to the next stage of development.  Endorsement was now sought to extend the use of WPC within the Council.

 

RECOMMENDED - T H A T the extension of WPC Mastercard Purchasing Cards for the Council be endorsed and implemented on a phased basis and the matter be referred to Cabinet for approval.

 

Reason for recommendation

 

To allow efficiencies to be obtained in the procurement processes in order that better and effective procurement was delivered.