LICENSING
COMMITTEE
MINUTES of a meeting held on 13th
November, 2007.
Present: Councillor J.W. Thomas
(Chairman); Councillor Mrs. V.M. Hartrey (Vice-Chairman);
Councillors Mrs. C.V.L. Clay, J. Clifford, Miss. J. Cole,
G.A. Cox, E. Hacker, A.D. Hampton, Mrs. M. Kelly Owen, A.G.
Powell, Mrs. A.J. Preston, Mrs. M. Randall and Mrs. M.R.
Wilkinson.
512 APOLOGIES FOR
ABSENCE -
These were received from Councillors S.C. Egan
and N.J. Gibbs.
513 MINUTES -
RESOLVED - T H A T the minutes of the
Licensing Committee held on 16th October, 2007 be
accepted.
514 DECLARATIONS OF
INTEREST -
No declarations were received.
515 APPLICATION FOR
THE GRANT OF A PRIVATE HIRE VEHICLE LICENCE (DLPPHS) -
An application had been received from a Mrs.
Joanna Mounter for the grant of a Private Hire Vehicle Licence, for
a vehicle that was outside the Council’s Age Policy
guidelines. The application was in respect of a Volkswagen
800 Special, Registration Number S19 JOM, which was a Prestige
2 vehicle and had to be first licensed before it was six years
old. The vehicle became six years old on 21st
June, 2007 and was 14 weeks over the age limit for the first time
licensing of a Prestige 2 vehicle at the time of application.
An application to licence the vehicle as a
Private Hire Vehicle was received on 1st October,
2007. The vehicle was tested by the Council’s garage at
Wenvoe on 18th October, 2007 and was subject to a retest
on 22nd October, 2007 when it was passed mechanically
fit with a passenger seating capacity of four.
RESOLVED - T H A T the Council’s Age Policy
guidelines be waived and a Private Hire Vehicle Licence be granted
to Mrs. Joanna Mounter in respect of a Volkswagen 800 Special,
Registration Number S19 JOM and a further condition be
attached to the Licence that this cannot be transferred.
516 APPLICATION FOR
THE GRANT OF A PRIVATE HIRE VEHICLE LICENCE (DLPPHS) -
An application had been received from Mr.
Terence MacDonald for the grant of a Private Hire Vehicle Licence
in respect of vehicle Vauxhall Omega, Registration Number R265 DWW
contrary to the Vale of Glamorgan Council’s Age Policy
Guidelines. The vehicle was first registered with the DVLA on
25th June, 1996 and licensed with the Authority as
a Private Hire Vehicle between 1st March, 22001 and
24th October, 2007 when the vehicle Licence
expired. The Vauxhall Omega was a Prestige Class 2 type
vehicle and had to be under six years old from the date of first
registration to be licensed as a Private Hire Vehicle. The
vehicle became 6 years old on 25th June, 2004. On
application, Mr. MacDonald made an appointment to have the vehicle
tested at the Alps garage on 24th October, 2007, the
last possible date that the vehicle could be tested for renewal of
the Licence. On 24th October, 2007
Mr. MacDonald attended the Civic Offices and informed
Licensing Officers that the vehicle was in the garage for
repair. He stated that he was unable to gain access to the
vehicle and therefore was unable to get it to the Alps garage for
testing. Failure to present the vehicle for inspection meant
that the Licence expired on 24th October, 2007 and the
renewal application made by Mr. MacDonald on 18th
October, 2007 was refused.
On 30th October, 2007 Mr MacDonald
made an application for the grant of a Licence and paid a further
fee in respect of this application. On 25th
October, 2007 the vehicle had been presented for testing at the
Wenvoe Garage and passed as mechanically fit.
Mr. MacDonald asked that the Committee
consider the extenuating circumstances of the case. He had
been unable to gain access in sufficient time as there had been a
bereavement at the garage where the car was placed for
repair. The garage was closed for a few days and during this
time Mr. MacDonald’s licence expired. It was therefore
necessary for him to make a new application and pay a further fee
which he now requested be refunded in view of the circumstances of
the case.
RESOLVED -
(1) T H A
T a Private Hire Vehicle Licence be granted in respect of Vauxhall
Omega, Registration Number R265 DWW.
(2)
T H A T the renewal fee be refunded in line with the Licensing
Section’s refund policy.
517 STREET TRADING
CONSENT - GLEBE STREET, PENARTH (DLPPHS) -
A request had been received from Miss.
Katie-Joy Smith to trade on the lower section of Glebe Street,
Penarth in connection with the Penarth Christmas lights event on
30th November, 2007. An application fee of £10 had
been paid. The Committee had been requested to set a balance
of fee, namely the approval fee, to ensure that the Council’s costs
were recovered in relation to the administration and enforcement of
the function.
RESOLVED - T H A T the street trading
application made by Miss. Katie-Joy Smith be approved and a balance
of fee in the sum of £40 be set.
518 STREET TRADING
CONSENTS - LUDLOW STREET AND GLEBE STREET, PENARTH (DLPPHS) -
Ten applications for Street Trading Consents
had been received in respect of the planned Continental Market at
Ludlow Street, Penarth on Sunday 2nd December,
2007. The Committee was requested to set the balance of fee
in respect of each application, namely the approval fee, to ensure
that the Council’s costs were recovered in relation to the
administration and enforcement of this function.
Each application had to be considered
separately and on its own merits. The hours of trading would
be between 9.00am and 6.00pm on Sunday
2nd December, 2007.
RESOLVED - T H A T the applications and
balance of fees in respect of each application as detailed below be
approved:
|
Application
Number
|
Name of Applicant
|
Type of Goods
|
Balance of
Fee
|
|
1
|
Nemat Murat
|
Greek olives, dried fruits, baklava, nuts
|
£174.80
|
|
2
|
Lukacs Lionel
|
Cheese, Turkish delights, Brittany
biscuits
|
£174.80
|
|
3
|
Coitau Legrand
|
Paella, tartfillette, cider crepes
|
£174.80
|
|
|
Subject to receipt of food hygiene
certificates
|
|
|
4
|
Gwenael Prie
|
Jewellery, Italian cashmere, jumpers
|
£174.80
|
|
5
|
Guy Rouviller
|
Pashminas, leather bags, gloves, fashion
items
|
£174.80
|
|
6
|
David James Bolster
|
Puppets, animal bags, purses, bags, grass
pets, wooden roses, silk flowers
|
£174.80
|
|
7
|
Sebastien Bristiel
|
Dried sausage and wine
|
£174.80
|
|
|
Subject to receipt of food hygiene
certificates
|
|
|
8
|
Thierry Stephane
|
Bakery items
|
£174.80
|
|
9
|
Paul Patey
|
Soap, lavender, leather belt, leather
items
|
£174.80
|
|
10
|
Edward Taylor
|
Fudge and sweets
|
£174.80
|
Mrs Kelly Owen declared an interest in the
above item and left the room during its consideration.
519 THE GAMBLING ACT
2005 - UNLICENSED FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT CENTRES (DLPPHS) -
On 2nd July, 2007 the Committee had
received a report on Unlicensed Family Entertainment Centres.
The Licensing Section had since received queries in relation to the
requirement to provide a CRB / Scottish Disclosure as part of the
application. Under the Gambling Act 2005 operators of Adult
Gaming Centres (AGCs) Casinos, Betting Premises, Bingo Premises and
Family Entertainment Centres were required to have a Personal
Licence from the Gambling Commission. The Gambling
Commission, in order to issue a Personal Licence, required a CRB
disclosure, a credit check, references and a police report if the
applicant had not been in the country for more than two
years.
The current requirement for all applicants to
provide a CRB / Scottish Disclosure with the Unlicensed Family
Entertainment Centre application was, in certain circumstances, a
duplication of work. Holders of Operator and Premises
Licences would have already been through a stringent process with
the Gambling Commission for their Personal Licence, which included
the requirement of an enhanced CRB disclosure. Applicants who
only required UFEC permits and were not Operators or Premises
Licence holders would still be required to submit a CRB / Scottish
Disclosure with the application to the Licensing Authority.
The Licensing Authority proposed to amend the
requirement to reflect by whom a CRB / Scottish Disclosure was
needed i.e. if not currently in possession of the Personal
Licence with the Gambling Commission.
RESOLVED - T H A T the guidance for Unlicensed
Family Entertainment Centres be amended to include additional
wording which related to a Criminal Records Bureau or Scottish
Disclosure Certificate to state that “only required if the
applicant does not hold a Personal Licence with the Gambling
Commission”.
520 THE GAMBLING ACT
2005 - LICENCE FEES AND CHARGES (DLPPHS) -
The Committee was requested to determine
Gambling Act licence fees and charges for Bingo Premises and to set
the Gambling Act licence fees and charges to take effect from
13th November, 2007.
The Gambling Act 2005 had been implemented in
stages and was brought into effect between March 2006 and September
2007. Licensing Authorities were responsible for issuing
Premises Licences and Gambling Permits. The general functions
of the Licensing Authority in dealing with Gambling Premises
Licences were delegated to the Licensing Committee. The
Government had issued, by way of a Statutory Instrument, the
Gambling (Premises Licence Fees) (England and Wales) Regulations
2007 which enabled Licensing Authorities to determine licence fees
and charges. Details contained within this report provided
information to enable the Licensing Authority to determine fees and
charges under the Gambling Act 2005. Under the Gambling Act
2005 there were functions that could not be delegated to the
Licensing Committee and might therefore only be carried out by Full
Council acting as the Licensing Authority in terms of setting fees
and charges. In terms of the setting of fees and charges the
Licensing Authority’s duty under Section 212 of the Act was to
determine the amount of fee. Full Council delegated this
matter on 14th February, 2007 where power to determine
all matters regulated by the Gambling Act 2005 were delegated to
the Licensing Committee. The Licensing Committee could set
the licence fees and charges under Section 212(b) of the Gambling
Act 2005.
RESOLVED -
(1) T H A
T the Licence Fees and Charges under Section 212(b) of the Gambling
Act 2005 in line with the Vale of Glamorgan Council’s Constitution
be agreed; and
(2) T H A
T the Gambling Act Licence Fees and Charges for Bingo Premises as
set out below be approved to take effect from 13th
November, 2007:
|
Type of Application
|
Fee
|
% of
Maxima
|
|
Application Fee
|
£2,100
|
60%
|
|
Application where provisional statement
previously issued
|
£675
|
56.25%
|
|
Annual Fee
|
£1,000
|
100%
|
|
Transfer Application Fee
|
£400
|
33.33%
|
|
Variation Application Fee
|
£1,300
|
75%
|
|
Provisional Statement Application Fee
|
£2,100
|
60%
|
|
Application for Reinstatement Fee
|
£700
|
58.3%
|
|
Change of Circumstances Fee
|
£50
|
100%
|
|
Duplicate Licence Fee
|
£25
|
100%
|
521 INFORMATION
REPORT: S. OLIVER (DLPPHS) -
On 10th April 2007, the Licensing
Committee received a report which related to Stephen Oliver’s
conviction for the use of a vehicle for the carriage of passengers
for hire and reward whilst that vehicle was the subject of a
Suspension Notice. On 25th August 2007, Mr. Oliver
appeared at Barry Magistrates’ Court and his appeal against the
revocation of his licence was heard. The Team Leader of the
Licensing Section and Licensing Officer were required to give
evidence in this matter. The Chairman and Vice-Chairman were
also required to give evidence as to how the Licensing Committee
reached their decision to revoke the licence. The Magistrates
considered the matter and the Committee’s decision to revoke the
licence was upheld. The Court ordered Mr. Oliver to pay a
contribution of the Local Authority’s costs to the amount of
£250.
On 6th September 2007, Mr. Oliver
lodged an appeal in relation to the Magistrates’ decision with
Cardiff Crown Court. On 19th October 2007, the
matter was heard and Her Honour Justice Rees considered the
evidence before her and dismissed Mr. Oliver’s appeal. The
Local Authority were awarded £1,000 as a contribution towards costs
incurred, payable by Mr. Oliver.
RESOLVED -
(1) T H A
T the position be noted.
(2) T H A
T officers be thanked for all their hard work and diligence in this
matter.
522 THE LICENSING
COMMITTEE AS APPOINTED UNDER THE LICENSING ACT 2003: THE LICENSING
ACT 2003 (LA) -
In accordance with Section 5 of the Licensing
Act 2003, a statutory review of the Vale of Glamorgan Council’s
Statement of Licensing Policy had been undertaken. The
Committee were asked to consider the comments raised in response to
the public consultation on the Vale of Glamorgan Council’s Draft
Statement of Licensing Policy. Any amendments to the Review
and Statement of Licensing Policy would be referred for decision by
Cabinet on 28th November 2007.
The Licensing Act 2003 placed a duty upon
Local Authorities to develop a Licensing Policy, which promoted the
four licensing objectives;
·
The Prevention of Crime and Disorder
·
Public Safety
·
Prevention of Public Nuisance
·
Protection of Children from Harm.
Section 5 of the Licensing Act 2003 places a
duty upon Local Authorities to review this policy and revise it if
necessary, every three years.
Control of licensed premises will be through
monitoring and enforcement. The issue of enforcement had to
be addressed in the Policy and the Secretary of State’s Guidance
states that enforcement should be targeted following risk
assessment.
No Licensing Authority would be able to deal
with an Application for any licences without having a reviewed
Statement of Licensing Policy in place prior to the beginning of
the second statutory three year period.
This is further clarified by Statutory
Instrument 2004 No. 2362, which states that the three year period
for reviewing licensing policies began on 7th January
2005. Therefore, the Statement of Licensing Policy for the
Vale of Glamorgan Council had to be published by the three year
anniversary of this date - 7th January 2008.
RECOMMENDED -
(1) T H A
T Members note the progress of the Statutory Review of the Vale of
Glamorgan Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy.
(2) T H A
T the amendments to be made to the reviewed Statement of Licensing
Policy be agreed.
(3) T H A
T the amended Statement of Licensing Policy be referred to Cabinet
on 28th November 2007 for approval.
(4) T H A
T the work of the Licensing Section in the preparation of the Vale
of Glamorgan Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy be recognised
and they be thanked for all their hard work.
523 EXCLUSION OF PRESS
AND PUBLIC -
RESOLVED - T H A T under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government
Act 1972, the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the
following items of business on the grounds that they involve the
likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part 4 of
Schedule 12A (as amended) of the Act, the relevant paragraphs of
the Schedule being referred to in brackets after the minute
heading.
524 APPLICATION FOR
HACKNEY CARRIAGE AND PRIVATE HIRE DRIVERS’ LICENCE: A. (DLPPHS)
(EXEMPT INFORMATION - PARAGRAPHS 12,13&14) -
J. A. had been interviewed by the Committee on
16th October 2007 to determine whether he was deemed to
be a fit and proper person to hold a Vale of Glamorgan Council
Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Drivers Licence. Licensing
Officers had referred the matter to the Committee due to comments
made by the Applicant’s General Practitioner on the completed
medical form. A letter was sent to the doctor on
22nd August 2007 seeking clarification of his
observations. A reply dated 29th August 2007 from
the doctor retracted his statement that he considered the Applicant
was fit to act as a driver of a Hackney Carriage or Private Hire
Vehicle.
On 16th October 2007, the Committee
deferred a decision on Mr. A.’s application for additional
information to be received from the Applicant’s doctor. A
letter was sent to the General Practitioner on 23rd
October 2007 but no response had been received to date.
Mr. A. had telephoned Licensing Officers to
confirm that he would not attend the hearing, without any
explanation being given. After careful consideration of all
available evidence, it was
RESOLVED - T H A T J. A. was not considered to
be a fit and proper person to hold a Vale of Glamorgan Council
Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Drivers Licence and his
application be refused due to the medical information received from
the Applicant’s General Practitioner, the evidence provided by
Licensing Officers as to J. A’s previous conduct and the comments
made by J. A. at the Committee meeting on 16th October
2007 in respect of not being able to offer reasonable assistance to
passengers in line with the Vale of Glamorgan’s Licensed Driver
conditions..
525 APPLICATION FOR
HACKNEY CARRIAGE AND PRIVATE HIRE DRIVER LICENCES: G.M. (DLPPHS)
(EXEMPT INFORMATION - PARAGRAPHS 12,13&14) -
On 12th April 2007, the Applicant
passed the basic English Test and applied for a Hackney Carriage
and Private Hire Vehicle Drivers Licence on 2nd May
2007. G.M. had subsequently failed three attempts at the
Knowledge Test. Both the English and Knowledge Test had to be
completed successfully before an applicant could be considered for
the grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Vehicle Drivers
Licence.
A letter had been received from G.M. to
request that he be allowed to sit a fourth Knowledge Test as part
of the current application.
RESOLVED - T H A T the request by G.M. to be
allowed to sit a fourth Knowledge Test, as part of the current
application, be refused and that his application for a Hackney
Carriage and Private Hire Vehicle Drivers Licence be refused as he
was not considered to be a fit and proper person due to his failure
to pass the Council’s Knowledge Test after three attempts.
526 APPLICATION FOR
HACKNEY CARRIAGE AND PRIVATE HIRE DRIVER LICENCES: A.A. (DLPPHS)
(EXEMPT INFORMATION - PARAGRAPHS 12,13&14) -
Mr. A. attended the meeting and the Legal
Officer outlined the procedure to be followed. On
12th August 2007, Mr. A. had passed his English Test and
had applied for a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Vehicle Drivers
Licence on 2nd May 2007. A.A. had subsequently
failed three attempts at the Council’s Knowledge Test. Both
the English and Knowledge Test had to be completed successfully
before an applicant could be considered for the grant of a Hackney
Carriage and Private Hire Vehicle Drivers Licence.
After careful consideration, the Committee
RESOLVED - T H A T the request by A.A. to be
allowed to sit a fourth Knowledge Test, as part of the current
application, be refused and that his application for a Hackney
Carriage and Private Hire Vehicle Drivers Licence be refused as he
was not considered to be a fit and proper person due to his failure
to pass the Council’s Knowledge Test after three attempts.
527 APPLICATION FOR
HACKNEY CARRIAGE AND PRIVATE HIRE DRIVER LICENCES: A.T. (DLPPHS)
(EXEMPT INFORMATION - PARAGRAPHS 12,13&14) -
A.T. attended the meeting and the Legal
Officer outlined the procedure to be followed. A.T. had
applied to be licensed as a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire
Vehicle Driver on 8th June 2007 and had successfully
completed his Basic English and Knowledge Test. On his
application form A.T. had indicated that he had no previous
convictions but a subsequent CRB disclosure revealed a matter
recorded against a person with similar details. The CRB had
sought clarification of a name change by the Applicant in 1995/1996
and it was confirmed that the CRB disclosure did relate to an
offence by the Applicant.
After consideration of the information given
by A.T., it was
RESOLVED - T H A T a Hackney Carriage and
Private Hire Vehicle Drivers Licence be granted to A.T.