SCRUTINY COMMITTEE (COMMUNITY WELLBEING AND
SAFETY)
MINUTES of a meeting held on 11th February, 2008.
Present: Councillor Mrs. M.E.J. Birch
(Chairman), Councillor K.R. Stockdale (Vice-Chairman), Councillors
Mrs. S.M. Bagstaff, R.J. Bertin, Ms. L. Burnett, P. Church, J.
Clifford, N.P. Hodges, H.J.W. James, G.C. Kemp, Mrs. A.J. Preston,
B.I. Shaw, J.W. Thomas and W.C. Vaughan.
Also Present: Councillor N. Moore.
758 APOLOGIES FOR
ABSENCE –
These were received from Councillors Ms. R.M.
Birch and Mrs. A.J. Moore.
759 ANNOUNCEMENT –
Apologies for their unavoidable absence were
received from Cabinet Members Councillors S.C. Egan and Mrs. M. R.
Wilkinson. The Committee also requested that their
condolences be extended to Councillor Mrs. M. R Wilkinson on the
recent sad loss of her father.
760 MINUTES –
RECOMMENDED – T H AT the minutes of the
meeting held on 14th January, 2008 be approved as a
correct record subject to Councillor N.P. Hodges’ name being added
to the list of apologies for absence.
761 DECLARATIONS OF
INTEREST –
No declarations were received.
762 SOCIAL SERVICES
DIRECTORATE INTERIM MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE) – CALL-IN REQUEST BY
COUNCILLOR G.C. KEMP –
The above matter had been considered by
Cabinet at its meeting on 23rd January, 2008.
Cabinet approval had been sought on re-organising the
management structure of the Social Services Directorate on an
interim basis. It was recommended that a new Directorate to
facilitate a clear corporate focus on Social Services be created.
The current management structure that had been introduced in
January 2007 had been intended to remain in place only until a new
and permanent Director of Social Services could take up post.
The impact of the restructuring that had taken place in 2007 had
been monitored by the Council and it had been acknowledged that
there was a clear case for further reorganisation due to a number
of shortfalls that had been identified:-
· inadequate
capacity at senior level to support the Director
· a lack of
coherence in the allocation of responsibilities at Operational
Manager level
· limited
opportunities for integrated working within the Council and with
other key
agencies
and
· the need for a
more purposeful approach to business planning and
commissioning.
The report had been presented to the Cabinet
as an urgent item by reason of the need to increase and realign
management capacity within the Social Services Directorate and to
achieve savings within the budget.
Cabinet resolved that the proposals outlined
in the report be endorsed for immediate implementation and that a
review of the interim structure proposed be presented to Cabinet in
January 2009.
The decisions of Cabinet had been called in by
Councillor G.C. Kemp to the Scrutiny Committee to allow “proper
scrutiny of such a fundamental change in structure”. The new
Director of Social Services advised the Scrutiny Committee that the
report had been necessary as a result of some serious shortfalls
within the current management structure. He considered that
the new structure would enable the management to manage the
considerable agenda for change that had been agreed. He
further advised that the structure was similar to those used by
other local authorities and that the Local Health Board had agreed
to part-fund a post which would ensure partnership working between
Health and the Council in view of the important issues faced by
both organisations. The Cabinet Member, Councillor N. Moore
was granted the opportunity to speak at the meeting and advised
that in order to progress the issues for Social Services the new
structure was essential. The call-in had also provided an
opportunity for the Cabinet Member and Director to advise Committee
on the detail of the proposals in view of the urgency of the
matter.
Scrutiny Committee members concurred that it
was essential to ensure that an effective management structure was
in place for the department and questioned whether they could have
sight of the job descriptions for the senior management positions
in particular the job description for the jointly funded post with
the LHB. The Director advised that the job descriptions had
been drafted in consultation with the Council’s HR Department and
the Health Board and were based also on models of good practice
elsewhere. The Senior Management Appointment Panel of the
Council was the vehicle that would consider the job descriptions
and job specifications for the appointments and it was imperative
that the process commence as soon as possible. Concern was
also expressed in relation to appointments being made on an interim
basis, however, the Director advised that in order to ensure
continuity within the Department a number of the posts would be
matched internally. In relation to the jointly funded post it
had been suggested that the appointment be for one year only in
order to fully appraise the role and the partnership approach.
Councillor Kemp stated that the purpose of the
call in had not been to add further delay but to ensure effective
Scrutiny was undertaken on the structure, and he was aware of the
need for the Social Services Department to move forward as soon as
possible. The Scrutiny Committee however requested that in
order to monitor the new structure that an interim update be
presented to the Scrutiny Committee by July 2008 on the
effectiveness of the new arrangements.
Having considered the matter in detail the
Scrutiny Committee
RECOMMENDED –
(1) T H A
T the resolutions of Cabinet be accepted.
(2) T H A
T a further report be presented to the Committee by July 2008
on the new arrangements in order that Members can be kept abreast
of service developments as they arise.
Reasons for recommendations
(1&2) In order that Members can be
updated on progress.
763 GRAFFITI –
A request for consideration of this matter had
been made to the Scrutiny Committees Economy and Environment,
Community Wellbeing and Safety and Lifelong Learning. The
matter had firstly been considered by the Scrutiny Committee
(Economy and Environment) at its meeting on 15th
January, 2008. The reason for the request had been to examine
the best methods of preventing graffiti, managing it and in order
that stakeholders such as police the youth service and other
relevant parties could be invited to attend to look for
solutions. The representatives who attended the Scrutiny
Committee (Economy and Environment) meeting advised that close
working relationships currently existed with agencies and had
proved effective in certain areas through the targeting of specific
locations and subsequent identification of key perpetrators.
This was coupled with the ongoing monitoring of the area and
expeditious removal of any graffiti in the areas together with
continuing dialogue with perpetrators, schools and the public in
general as to their involvement in engendering a sense of community
responsibility. A survey had been undertaken of the
environmental quality in the Vale by Keep Wales Tidy in October
2007 which had indicated that graffiti was recorded on 22% of the
6% of the streets surveyed. The report had also indicated
that the range of environmental problems such as graffiti were more
prevalent in areas such as Barry. With regard to technical
solutions for the prevention and removal of graffiti it was stated
that depending on the nature of the service (porous or non-porous)
and the type of application, medium/type of paint a number of
methods were available namely high pressure washing, the
application of solvent based solutions in liquid, gel or aerosol
form, painting over the offending graffiti and the removal of the
structure that was the subject of graffiti. Trials that had
previously been carried out by the Visible Services section on
pedestrian underpasses using special anti-graffiti coatings had
proved unsuccessful. Attention was drawn to the fact that the
nature of the chemical used for graffiti removal would also prevent
a problem for working with current partners because of the age
group carrying out the work within the YOS (Youth Offending
Service). The simple painting over of graffiti was considered
to be a very cost effective and efficient way of dealing with the
matter and Members further requested that “black paint” be
purchased for the use on alley gates in order to ensure that any
graffiti was removed as quickly as possible. Having
considered the matter the Scrutiny Committee
RECOMMENDED -
(1) T H
AT the recommendations of the Scrutiny Committee (Economy and
Environment) as below be endorsed :-
· That a
further report examining the variety of technical solutions
available relating to the prevention and/or the removal of graffiti
be made to a subsequent meeting, preceded by a feasible and
physical demonstration of products used.
· That
given the expeditious removal of graffiti was considered to be a
prime motivator as regards a reduction in such incidents
consideration be given to the Council taking a lead in raising
public awareness of ways in which graffiti could be prevented or
removed by publishing such information through its website and/or
Vale Waves for example, such information to be subject to a
disclaimer that the Council accepted no liability in respect of the
effectiveness of such products nor for any subsequent damage to
property occasioned as a consequence of their use.
(2) T H A
T the relevant department purchases black paint to be used to
eradicate graffiti on alley gates.
Reasons for recommendations
(1) To
allow for further information to be presented to Members and to
offer a public service.
(2) To
ensure that graffiti is removed on alley gates as soon as
possible.
764 REVENUE AND
CAPITAL MONITORING FOR THE PERIOD 1ST APRIL, 2007 –
31ST DECEMBER, 2007 (DLPPHS) –
The report outlined the position in respect of
Revenue and Capital expenditure for the period 1st April
to 31st December, 2007. In respect of the Housing
Department both the Public Sector Housing and Private Sector
Housing budgets were anticipated to outturn on target with the
Housing Revenue account anticipated to outturn on target with an
estimated surplus of £868,000.
For General Fund Services the budget was
projected to outturn with a deficit of £1,289,000, a reduction of
£231,000 from the previous months figures. The report further
highlighted that the Director of Social Services had presented a
revised action plan to Cabinet and the Scrutiny Committee which had
identified further savings that could be achieved in the current
year. The budget would therefore continue to be monitored in
order that the effectiveness of the proposals could be
assessed.
In respect of the Children’s Services
department, the outturn was currently showing as a surplus of
£190,000, which it was reported was mainly attributable to the
reduction in the costs of children’s placements of £66,000 and
savings on fostering costs of £135,000.
In respect of Community Care and Health, the
service was projected to outturn with a deficit of £1,486,000 at
the year end. The position reflected the continued pressures
on Community Care packages which had been reduced by a
recalculation of the projected known commitments and identified
savings on salaries. The figure included the increase in care
home fees which had been agreed and an estimate of new commitments
which may be made before the year end.
Members requested the up to date position in
respect of the new arbitration case and were advised that the
Council was in arbitration proceedings with Council’s case
recently having been filed. It was reported that a more
robust presentation had been made with the assistance of the Legal
Department and Finance Department for the proceedings.
Members were further advised that the WLGA and Welsh Assembly
Government had been lobbied in respect of the issue but that in the
circumstances it was considered to be the responsibility of the
Council to deal with the matter locally rather than wait for the
WLGA and Welsh Assembly Government to take the lead.
Financial progress on the capital programme
was detailed at Appendix 2 of the report and Members were further
advised that a Flying Start Grant had been approved by the Welsh
Assembly Government for the Maes-y-Coed outdoor area refurbishment
which would be fully funded by WAG to the sum of £13,000.
Members queried the current position in
respect of the Harbour View lease repurchases and were advised that
the Compulsory Purchase Orders were nearing completion with the
ultimate aim of Crest Nicholson being on the site as soon as
possible. It was however confirmed that no compensation would
have to be paid to Crest Nicholson as a result of the delay.
A fire had recently taken place at the Penarth Heights site but it
was confirmed that all access points to the site were now secure,
some security costs would however continue until Crest Nicholson
was on site.
In respect of Barry Hostel, the Committee was
advised that a hand over meeting had taken place that day for the
office accommodation and staff would be moving in before the end of
the month. With regard to Southways, it was confirmed
that work would be completed by the end of the current financial
year.
RECOMMENDED – T H A T the Revenue and Capital
Monitoring report for the period 1st April, 2007 –
31st December, 2007 be noted.
Reason for recommendation
For Members information.
765 PROGRESS REPORT ON
THE SOCIAL SERVICES CHANGE PLAN 2007/2010 (DSS) –
An updated Change Plan was presented to
Members at Appendix 1 to the report. The format had been
revised to show that out of the 71 original actions, 27 had been
completed. For each of the ongoing actions the columns
showed whether they were on target or delayed. Members were
advised that the main cause of delay had been the limited Senior
Management capacity that had been available to the previous Interim
Director. New actions had also been added which had been in
part inserted to demonstrate that the Council was responding to
recommendations from recent external scrutiny exercises although no
progress was described against the new actions at present.
The four key themes within the Change Plan were leadership, budget,
performance and quality. In respect of the budget a revised
Budget Action Plan had been approved by Cabinet and considered by
the Scrutiny Committee on 14th January, 2007.
Discussion therefore ensued as follows :-
|
Reference and Question
|
Answer
|
|
SP2 – Develop / organise risk management
skills of managers
|
Some training had commenced but further work
in relation to competencies was required via PDRs. Financial
training had also started week commencing 11th February
in respect of budget delegation.
|
|
SB4 - Predict future demand and needs based on
demographic evidence.
|
Members queried the current uptake of Telecare
Services and were advised that a further publicity drive would be
undertaken as there had been little uptake to date. It was
agreed that it was important to inform the public what the service
was about and how it could be used in their daily
life.
|
|
SB6 – Review levels of sickness absence
|
The necessary plans had been put in place but
it was an on-going action which would require constant
monitoring. Members requested whether there had been
any improvements in the area and were advised that a report would
be presented to Cabinet and the Scrutiny Committee in the near
future.
|
|
SQ7B – Review all out of county adult
placements and consider alternative provision.
|
The Department was considering undertaking a
pilot for all reviews although this had been delayed due to the
delay in staff appointments. It was also necessary to confirm
that all information on clients was correct before any reviews
could be undertaken.
|
|
SP15a – Review use of ILF.
|
Members requested whether a further publicity
drive in respect of the uptake for benefits should be encouraged
and the officer confirmed that an increase of awareness had
recently taken place but it was difficult to assess how much uptake
had been made.
|
|
SP26 – Find solutions to reduce the
Occupational Therapy waiting lists
|
Vacancies had been filled and an audit of the
waiting list had commenced. Referrals were dealt with for a
number of categories with the OT2 waiting lists being the
largest. Members requested that information on the categories
and the current waiting lists be forwarded to all Members of the
Scrutiny Committee by e-mail.
|
Having considered the report the Scrutiny
Committee
RECOMMENDED –
(1) T H A
T the report be noted and the information requested under SB6
and SP26 be presented to Members as soon as possible.
(2) T H A
T the SSIW Inspector be invited to attend a meeting of the Scrutiny
Committee before the end of the current municipal year.
(3) T H A
T the Change Plan continues to be reported to the Scrutiny
Committee in order that efficient / effective scrutiny can take
place.
Reasons for recommendations
(1)&(3) In
order that the improvements required in Social Services can be
monitored.
(2) In
order that Members can be apprised of key findings from the
inspectors Annual Report.
766 3RD
QUARTER PERFORMANCE MONITORING (DSS) –
(i) Community Care
and Health
Members requested that the officers present
the report paying particular attention to the PI’s that were below
target with the service not achieving performance.
|
PI
No.
|
Description
|
Answer
|
|
SCA2A
|
The rate of older people helped to live at
home per 1000 population aged 65 or over.
|
One of the reasons why the PI was below target
was due to the fact that the Department had set itself a
challenging target. However, the recent staff problems had
meant that this target had not been achieved. There had also
been an increase in the demand for new referrals.
|
|
SCA12B & C
|
The percentage of identified carers of adult
service users who had an assessment and the percentage of
identified carers of adult service users who had an assessment in
their own right.
|
Members considered that the two PI’s were
almost identical and they were advised that the Welsh Assembly
Government were considering deleting one of them. During
discussion of the targets it was confirmed that in view of the
Social Services budget position and the moratorium on recruitment,
officers had been requested to present a case for key posts
although it was confirmed that priority was being given to adult
care management posts in particular in respect of the amount of
assessments that were required.
|
It was noted that information on a number of
PI’s was not available due to the Oracle System but that they would
be reported in the final quarter.
(ii)
Children and Family Services –
In respect of a number of the targets
Committee was advised that there was a continuing drive within the
Department to deal with core and initial assessments. It was
apparent that the target of 100% would not be met. The new
ICS system was also experiencing difficulties.
|
PI
No.
|
Description
|
Answer
|
|
SCC9B & SCC8B
|
The average time taken to complete those
required core assessments that took longer than 35 days and the
average time taken to complete the initial assessments that took
longer than 7 working days to complete.
|
The under performance was a concern to the
team and concentrated attention needed to be ensured on the service
area. The Director advised that there were some performance
targets that were obstacles for the Department but that in other
service areas targets had been increased and improvements
noted. The Department clearly needed to drive assessments
forward and when resources were concentrated in one area other
areas suffered.
|
|
SCCL11B
|
The percentage of initial assessments that
took place during the year where there is evidence that the child
has been seen alone by the Social Worker
|
Further work needed to be undertaken to ensure
that Social Workers recorded the relevant information.
|
|
SCC29B
|
Under this target, Members queried the
advocacy service that used to be in
operation.
|
This Service had been replaced with a spot
purchasing agreement. The Social Worker had to present a case
to the manager for advocacy services as appropriate.
|
|
SCC25
|
Percentage of statutory visits to looked after
children during the year that took place in accordance with the
regulations
|
Members noted that there had been a decline in
each of the quarters and were advised that the PI had also been
identified in the Change Plan due to the fact general recording
within the department was an issue and had been identified as an
area for improvement within the Change Plan.
|
|
SC26B (ii)
|
The gross weekly expenditure per looked after
child in children’s homes excluding secure accommodation -
externally purchased provision
|
Members were informed that in order to fully
compare and consider the PI a full years costing information would
be more beneficial.
|
Having considered the Monitoring Report
discussion ensued regarding whether the percentage for some targets
should be changed and re-set. It was, however, agreed that
the target should remain as was but that it would be useful for the
Committee to receive trend data and also benchmarking information
with other local authorities.
In relation to the issue of recording, the
Director advised the Committee that one of his first priorities was
to look at social work practice and to do this he would be sampling
case files on a regular basis.
(iii)
Strategy and Performance Management and Commissioning –
The Service only had local PIs and the PI that
was below target was L516 – Community Care Finance – percentage of
service users visited within 15 working days of financial
assessment being requested. It was considered that the target
that had been set was too high and should be noted at 80%.
However, during discussion it was suggested that the target remain
at 85% and that further information be obtained from other local
authorities as to how they dealt with the issue and when received,
the details be presented in the 4th Quarter.
767 3RD
QUARTER PERFORMANCE MONITORING –
(i) Housing –
Concern was expressed in relation to the
percentage of homeless presentations accepted as statutorily
homeless, as the indicator was below target. The officer
advised that by improving preventative services this had an adverse
effect on other indicators. The Homelessness Service was
currently undergoing a restructuring and the difficulty facing the
service to ensure continuity. It was be inevitable that with
the introduction of new staff, that decisions would take longer to
be agreed.
Members also noted the increase in the average
number of calendar days taken to let units and were advised that as
a result of bringing the two Penarth Heights properties back into
stock this had increased the numerator.
The figures were also affected by the time
taken by the process itself, ie the date the properties were
referred for repair, the time that the building maintenance section
took to undertake repair work and from the date the properties were
able to be re-let. Discussion took place as to whether it
would be possible to identify measures that could be put in place
in relation to void properties, in particular, for properties that
required little renovation that the turn around time for letting be
increased as opposed to properties which required substantial
repair works.
Members were updated that the homeless leasing
scheme had not effectively been introduced to date but a pilot
scheme was due to commence in relation to 10 properties. The
question was also raised in relation to whether there was a limit
to the time somebody could be accommodated in bed and breakfast.
New guidance was due to be introduced which would provide details
on timescales, for example clients would be able to remain in such
accommodation for up to 14 days and thereafter it would be a
requirement on the Local Authority to offer alternative
accommodation. However, if the client preferred to stay in a
B&B as opposed to alternative accommodation they would be able
to do so for up to 56 days.
(ii)
Private Sector Housing and Community Safety –
The Vice-Chairman presented a copy of a recent
news article which provided details of an innovative idea by Kent
County Council which offered incentives on Council properties in
order for them to be let quicker however Members were advised that
in the Vale of Glamorgan there was currently no housing assistance
outside renewal areas. However, although there were relatively few
empty properties where they cause a problem, owners were being
contacted and given appropriate advice. Members queried
issues surrounding Disabled Facilities Grants and were advised that
the Committees Occupational Therapist Task and Finish Group would
be considering the matter at its next meeting and the Scrutiny
Committee itself would receive a report from the group in due
course which was duly accepted. Members were also advised
that in relation to Community Safety matters representatives from
the Police would be attending the next meeting of the Scrutiny
Committee to concentrate on areas of concern.
In relation to the Local Performance Indicator
L486 the inspection of houses in multiple occupation, Members noted
that only a small number of premises had been inspected to date.
They were advised that this was due to a staff vacancy and as there
was only a small team, reactive or service requests were given
priority.
RECOMMENDED -
(1) T H A
T the third quarter performance monitoring reports and answers be
noted.
(2) T H A
T the necessary arrangements be made for the representative from
South Wales Police to attend the next meeting of the Committee.