SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
(ECONOMYAND ENVIRONMENT)
MINUTES of a meeting held on 15th
January, 2008.
Present: Councillor N.P. Hodges
(Chairman); Councillor S.T. Wiliam (Vice-Chairman); Councillors
R.J. Bertin, J. Clifford, Miss J. Cole, G.A. Cox,
Mrs. M. Kelly Owen, Mrs. A.J. Preston, Mrs. S.I. Sharpe,
and M.R. Wilson.
Also present: Councillors R.F. Curtis
and G. John.
695 APOLOGIES FOR
ABSENCE -
These were received from Councillors Ms. L.
Burnett, A.D. Dobbinson,
E. Hacker, Mrs. A.J. Moore, W.C. Vaughan and
A.J. Williams.
696 MINUTES -
RECOMMENDED - T H A T the minutes of the
meeting held on 27th November and 4th
December, 2007 and the extraordinary meeting held on
19th December, 2007 be approved as a correct record.
697 DECLARATIONS OF
INTEREST -
No declarations were received.
698 GRAFFITI (REQUEST
FOR CONSIDERATION SUBMITTED BY COUNCILLOR M.R. WILSON) -
Councillor M.R. Wilson had requested
consideration of the above matter in order to examine the best
methods of preventing graffiti, managing it and to invite
stakeholders such as the police, youth service and other relevant
parties to look for solutions. Mr. P. Martin from the
Probation Service and Sgt. N. Streeter from South Wales Police
had been invited to attend the meeting specifically for that
purpose, together with Mr. M. Robertson, Youth Offending Services
(Y.O.S.) and Ms. D. White (Senior Compliance / Enforcement
Officer).
Contained within the papers for the meeting
was a report from the Director which examined the existing
management of graffiti within the area of the Vale. It was
reported that graffiti removal was currently carried out within
Waste Management by the deployment of the Waste Management and
Cleansing Division’s Street Care Team where graffiti removal would
be carried out on street and road signs, bus stops and relevant
land for which the Team had a cleansing duty. Whilst
offensive or racist graffiti was removed as a priority, normally
within one working day, the removal of graffiti on private property
did not fall within the Council’s statutory duty and was the
responsibility of the land or building owner. However, in
conjunction with other bodies within the Safer Vale Partnership and
subject to the owner signing a waiver, graffiti on private property
could be removed and generally the assistance of the Probation
Service was used to undertake such work.
The representatives from each of the agencies
referred to above confirmed their involvement in the process and
the close working relationships which existed - and which had
proved so effective in certain areas through the targeting of
specific locations and subsequent identification of key
perpetrators. The above, coupled with the ongoing monitoring
of the area and expeditious removal of any graffiti in those areas
together with continuing dialogue with perpetrators, schools and
the public in general as to their involvement in engendering a
sense of community responsibility, were all aimed at further
improving the current situation. Mr. Robertson confirmed that
some offenders had subsequently worked on the reparations team
through the Y.O.S. and Ms. White drew attention to the fact that
there was a re-offending rate of just 25% in the Vale.
Tribute was also paid to the work of the Visible Crew (an
initiative launched in May 2007 brining together representatives
from the Y.O.S., police, probation, Council and others) in
improving the environment generally and the recent award in
recognition of those services from Keep Wales Tidy.
A recent survey of the environmental quality
of the Vale by Keep Wales Tidy in October 2007 had indicated
that graffiti was recorded on 22% of the 6% of streets surveyed,
that is, a very small number of streets Vale-wide albeit a 1% rise
from the previous survey. That report had also indicated that
a range of environmental problems, such as graffiti, were more
prevalent in areas such as Barry. WAG’s proposed Code of
Practice on Litter and Refuse and Associated Guidance 2007
contained advisory standards for dealing with graffiti,
recommending that local authorities should always remove graffiti
from public property and should also work with private property
owners to seek the removal of graffiti to specified standards.
Attention was drawn to the fact, however, that
the adoption of the advisory standards for graffiti would exceed
the existing funding for the service. As indicated above, it
was considered that present service arrangements could still
achieve improvements to the current situation by continuing
effective partnership working and effective enforcement. In
response to a question relating to the sale of aerosol spray paints
to persons aged under 16, whilst no incidents of prosecutions
having been taken out against those contravening the law were
known, Sergeant Streeter confirmed that the police had discussed
the issue with shopkeepers to raise awareness of the matter and
that that had resulted in certain shopkeepers being more
circumspect when selling such items. As regards technical
solutions to the prevention and removal of graffiti, the
supplementary report outlined those factors which required to be
taken into consideration. Depending on the nature of the
service (porous or non-porous) and the type of application medium /
type of paint, a number of methods were available, namely high
pressure washing; the application of solvent-based solutions in
liquid, gel or aerosol form; painting over the offending graffiti;
and the removal of the structure that was subject of
graffiti. Trials previously carried out by Visible Services
on pedestrian underpasses using special anti-graffiti coatings had
been proved unsuccessful. Attention was also drawn to the
fact that the nature of the chemical used for graffiti removal
would also present a problem for working with current partners
because of the age group carrying out the work within the
Y.O.S. The simple painting over of graffiti was considered as
a consequence to be a very cost-effective and efficient way of
dealing with the matter. In response to the suggestion that
the public be given information relating to specialist graffiti
removal companies / products, Committee was informed that currently
enquiries for any specialist waste management private sector
contractor from residents were referred to the “Yellow Pages” or
the appropriate trade publication. It was also noted that
whilst a number of other local authorities operated specialist
graffiti removal teams, current service levels were very similar to
this Council.
Further discussion ensued on the above and
related topics, following which the Chairman expressed the thanks
of the Committee to the external experts and invited officers for
their contribution to the discussions.
RECOMMENDED -
(1) T H A T a further
report examining the variety of technical solutions available
relating to the prevention and/or removal of graffiti be made to a
subsequent meeting, preceded by, if feasible, a physical
demonstration of the products used.
(2) T H A T, given
that the expeditious removal of graffiti was considered to be a
prime motivator as regards a reduction in such incidents,
consideration be given to the Council taking a lead in raising
public awareness of ways in which graffiti could be prevented or
removed by publishing such information through its website and/or
Vale Waves for example, such information to be subject to a
disclaimer that the Council accepted no liability in respect of the
effectiveness of such products nor for any subsequent damage to
property occasioned as a consequence of their use.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To allow further
consideration of the matter.
(2) To offer a public
service.
699 REVENUE AND
CAPITAL MONITORING: 1ST APRIL 2007 TO
30TH NOVEMBER 2007 (DEER) -
The projected outturn for the 2007/08 Revenue
Budget was shown in comparison with the Annual Budget in Appendix 1
to the report, the current forecast being for a balanced
budget. Details of the current variances in various services
were contained within the report, it being noted that the position
in each case would be closely monitored to ensure that, where there
was an adverse variance at present, the necessary savings were
met. As regards the Capital Programme, details
regarding progress as at 30th November, 2007 were
appended to the report. Cabinet had recently approved the
following changes to the 2007/08 Capital Programme:
· Visible Services asset
renewal 2007/08 - an increase in the Capital Programme of £9k. in
respect of the public convenience at Porthkerry Park
· Visible Services asset
renewal 2006/07 - an increase in the Capital Programme of £61k. in
respect of the Knap Skateboard Park
· Holton Road Public Realm
Improvements - an increase in the Capital Programme of £451k. to
extend the works at the lower end of Holton Road
As regards those schemes which would not be
completed on target, Cabinet had agreed that Council be asked to
approve the following changes:
· Barry Island Replacement
Footbridge - reduce the current budget to £38k. (carry forward
£360k. into 2008/09)
· Dyffryn Gardens Phase 1 -
reduce the current budget to £204k. (carry forward £332k. into
2008/09)
· Waste Resource Park -
reduce the current budget to £40k. (carry forward £870k. into
2008/09)
· Spine Road Infrastructure /
Innovation Quarter - reduce the current budget to nil (carry
forward £200k. into 2008/09).
In response to a question relating to the
Waste Resource Park, it was explained that the budget had been
reduced in line with a small amendment to the current design
relating to a slight reduction in floor area.
RECOMMENDED - T H A T the position with regard
to the 2007/08 Capital and Revenue Monitoring be noted.
Reason for recommendation
That Members are aware of the position with
regard to the 2007/08 Revenue and Capital Monitoring relevant to
the Committee.
700 THE IMPLICATIONS
OF THE WASTE AGENDA: PROSIECT GWYRDD (DEER) -
In June 2007, the Scrutiny Committee
(Corporate Resources) had requested a further report in respect of
the cost implications and cost benefits for the Council associated
with the shared service proposals relating to waste (Minute No.
154). Members were consequently updated on the progress to
date and the cost implications of Prosiect Gwyrdd, it being noted
that Prosiect Gwyrdd dealt only with residual waste.
Significant progress had been made since June 2007 to develop the
project and make progress in reaching a possible procurement
function including the formation of an Officer Steering Group, the
formation of an Elected Member Steering Group, the appointment of
Legal, Financial and Technical external advisors, the appointment
of a Project Manager and the Memorandum of Understanding completed
and signed off. Work on the Outline Business Case had
commenced, that work being anticipated to be completed in February
/ March 2008. All five authorities involved had invested
significant resources and had clearly demonstrated their
determination to make the partnership deliver its agreed
objectives. A future residual treatment option was considered
to be the only way that local authorities could deal with any
residual waste remaining following the recycling and composting of
their municipal waste arisings. The WAG’s future Municipal
Waste Targets (announced in October 2007) and the continued
dialogue between the partnership authorities and WAG would have a
major bearing on the Outline Business Case (OBC) and the
affordability gap that would need to be bridged to deliver the
Prosiect Gwyrdd objectives. It was reported that following
completion of the pre-procurement stage, each member council would
review the work undertaken, the further work required to deliver
Prosiect Gwyrdd and determine if the project was to continue.
As part of the project, joint applications would continue to be
made to WAG for further grant aid to supplement the £600k.
contributed to date. That grant covered a 30 month period and
was claimable against 70% of all eligible costs associated with the
procurement process; it was not, however, ring-fenced to the
pre-procurement work. All five partnership authorities had
now provided written confirmation acknowledging an equal initial
individual financial commitment of £46,942 to progress the OBC to
completion in 2007/08.
Appended to the report was an indicative
procurement cost schedule for the period 2007/08 - 2009/10.
All of this Council’s financial commitments during the
pre-procurement process (up to £250k.) would be made from the
existing Visible Services Reserve. Attention was also drawn
to the fact that considerable officer time would be required and,
to lessen the burden on the partnership authorities, £124k. had
been set aside for 2007/08 within the procurement cost schedule to
allow for backfilling required to cover the costs of lead officers
within the project. Other separate budgets heads had also
been identified as follows:
· Project Manager and Project
Support -
£61k.
· Communication and Planning
Support
-
£11k.
· Supplies and
Services -
£ 9k.
The schedule also identified the WAG Regional
Capital Access Funding (RCAF) within 2007/08 to be £79k. In
summary, the overall cost for pre-procurement production of the OBC
was shown to be £1,583,571. Given the amount of existing
grant support being £600,000, the adjusted total of £983,571 would
result in a total cost commitment of £196,714 for each of the
partnership authorities. In response to a question relating
to any subsequent requirement for capital funding, it was noted
that no specific allocation had been set aside although at a later
date a case for prudential borrowing might be identified or,
possibly, private funding might be forthcoming. The Cabinet
Member for Visible Services drew attention to the need for Members
to be aware of the various technologies involved in the treatment
of residual waste, remarking that the WAG had capped the “Energy
from Waste” quota to just 30%, emphasising that the optimum way
forward was through recycling. Once again, Members were
reminded that recycling rates would need to be significantly
increased and there would be a future need for considerable
investment. Regular update reports would be made to this
Committee and, following further consideration of the position, it
was
RECOMMENDED - T H A T the cost implications
for the Council as outlined in the above report associated with the
procurement of the shared services proposals relating to residual
waste treatment be noted.
Reason for decision
To make Committee aware of the possible costs
associated with the Council’s association with Prosiect Gwyrdd.
(Note: Councillor R.F. Curtis spoke on the
above matter with the consent of the Committee).
701 PENARTH LEISURE
CENTRE - EFFECT OF INTERNATIONAL SPORTS VILLAGE (DEER) -
As requested at a previous meeting, Members
were informed of the potential effects of the opening of the
International Sports Village (ISV) on Penarth Leisure Centre and
the measures taken to date to reduce that impact. The ISV was
a private and public joint funded high quality swimming complex,
the potential impact of which was very significant. Whilst
the ISV contained a 50m. competitive swimming pool, it was
considered that the leisure pool (containing the latest fun
features) and fitness facilities (with brand new separate changing
rooms) would have the biggest impact. Measures had already
been taken to reduce the potential impact with a number of
initiatives, including:
· a marketing campaign
(details appended to the report)
· a review of prices
for Lifestyle to compete with the ISV resulting in reduced
prices
· a variation to
opening hours
· a clear explanation
of the advantages of being a Lifestyle Member as opposed to other
facilities
· some changing room
improvements out of existing asset renewal funding.
It was noted that while the ISV did not have a
sports hall, a wide variety of fitness classes would be offered in
its purpose built dance / aerobics studios. Levels of usage
of Penarth Leisure Centre were expected to drop, particularly in
the first year of opening of the ISV, although it was too early to
evaluate fully the true impact of the ISV. Penarth Leisure
Centre had been the Council’s most visited building every year
since its opening and had attracted not only residents from the
Vale but from West Cardiff. The Leisure Centre had also been
the venue for a number of high profile events including the
Antiques Road Show, National Tae Kwando Championship, Concerts and
Conferences and National and Local Swimming Galas. It was
considered possible that a number of swimming galas would transfer
to the ISV but, nevertheless, it was considered that the presence
of a sports hall in Penarth would mean that the Leisure Centre
continued to attract certain events. Officers would continue
to market the Leisure Centre in order to maintain and improve usage
subject to budgeting considerations and attention was drawn to the
fact that any future improvements to the Leisure Centre would have
to compete with the demand for asset renewal resources.
Appended to the report were details of current
usage of leisure centres across Wales and of the current budget
spend per head on sport and recreation. Those figures showed
that Penarth had attracted 493,698 customers during the last
financial year and demonstrated that, whilst the Council was
presently one of the lowest spenders on sport and recreation per
head of population, Penarth Leisure Centre ranked in fact in the
top 5 in Wales. Tribute was paid to the highly trained and
motivated staff employed at the Leisure Centre whom, it was
considered, greatly contributed to continuing customer
loyalty.
Whilst accepting there would be a likely
drop-off in the numbers at least initially, discussion ensued on
way in which to encourage use of the Centre, to maintain its
existing customers and to identify potential new markets.
Attention was drawn to presently unused space at the Centre,
occasioned as a consequence of the closure of the bar and catering
facilities, and the desirability of bringing those spaces into
beneficial use thereby increasing income. All the gyms in the
Centre had now reached saturation point but it was recognised that
any such refurbishment would require investment and that resources
were limited / targeted elsewhere. Nevertheless, it was felt
that other opportunities existed with one option being to maximise
the synergy between leisure and health by attracting a surgery type
facility either into or adjacent to the Centre.
RECOMMENDED -
(1) T H A T
Leisure Centre staff be commended for their enthusiasm and
commitment to not only running the Centres but for their
suggestions as to ways in which to improve and expand the services
offered, and a letter sent to that effect by the Chairman.
(2) T H A T
Cabinet be requested to consider maximising those suggestions as to
ways in which to improve and expand services, including making
available additional funding for asset renewal.
(3) T H A T the
measures taken to date to mitigate the potential effects of the ISV
on the Leisure Centre through, for example, the flexible approach
to charging, be endorsed.
(4) T H A T
further consideration be given to means of publicising the
facilities on offer at all the Council’s leisure facilities,
including the feasibility of advertising on bus tickets and on
Council owned bus stops - promoting at the same time the frequency
of Cardiff Bus services (quoted in the case of the Penarth Leisure
Centre as being every 7 minutes as opposed to every 30 minutes to
the ISV).
(5) T H A T a
site visit be held at one of the Council’s Leisure Centres in order
to see at first hand possible areas for expansion and potential
investment and to identify possible threats / opportunities.
Reasons for recommendations
(1) To recognise
the contribution made.
(2) To improve
services.
(3) To endorse
the approach taken.
(4) To encourage
use.
(5) To examine
possibilities.
(Note:
(i) Councillor Bertin reminded
Members that he had been granted dispensation to speak in
connection with Cardiff City Transport Services, trading as Cardiff
Bus.
(ii) Councillors R.F. Curtis and
G. John spoke on the above matter with the consent of the
Committee).
702 SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
- TRACKING OF RECOMMENDATIONS (DLPPHS) -
Progress in relation to recommendations made
by this Committee during the period July to September 2007 and
October to December 2007 and those recommendations uncompleted for
the April to June quarter was submitted. The Committee’s
views were requested relating to the progress against each
recommendation, whether further action might be required, whether
the required action had been undertaken, and confirmation of those
actions which had been completed.
Having considered the report, it was
RECOMMENDED -
(1) T H A T the
actions detailed as completed below (and as appended to the report)
be agreed:
|
17th April 2007 - Min. No. 1014
|
Review of Scrutiny Arrangements -
R(2) Develop a pre-work programme
evaluation and checklist when scoping reviews to assess the
suitability of potential work programme items paying particular
regard to the Council’s risk register, corporate priorities and
Cabinet forward work programme
|
Completed
(Agreed by Scrutiny
Chairmen & Vice-Chairmen Group
17 Oct 2007)
|
|
|
R(4) When managing Committee business,
that Scrutiny Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen consider inviting
Executive Members
|
Completed
(Discussed by Scrutiny
Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen Group)
|
|
17th July 2007 - Min. No. 222
|
Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan (LDP)
- Revision of Approved Delivery Agreement
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3127
18 Jul 2007)
|
|
17th July 2007 - Min. No. 223
|
Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan (LDP)
- Strategy Options Stakeholder Workshop Findings - recommendation
(1)
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3180
18 Jul 2007)
|
|
17th July 2007 - Min. No. 225
|
The Pound - Llanblethian
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3193
19 Sep 2007)
|
|
17th July 2007 - Min. No. 226
|
Prosiect Gwyrdd - A Regional Partnership for
the Procurement of a Residual Waste Treatment Solution
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3148(a)
25 Jul 2007)
|
|
4th September 2007 - Min. No.
295
|
Revenue and Capital Monitoring: 1st
April 2007 - 31st July 2007 relating to progress on
Barry Central Station, Knap Lake Shelter Refurbishment and Cogan
Hall Farm Landscaping
|
Completed
(various actions in Sep
2007)
|
|
4th September 2007 - Min. No.
296
|
Building and Vehicle Services - Appointment
and Development of Apprentices -
(2) Endorsement of intended review for revised
/ additional training schemes within Building and Vehicle
Services
|
Completed
(E&E
4 Sep 2007)
|
|
4th September 2007 - Min. No.
297
|
The Pound, Llanblethian
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3193
19 Sep 2007)
|
|
2nd October 2007 - Min. No. 391
|
Home Composting and Performance Indicators
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3236
17 Oct 2007)
|
|
2nd October 2007 - Min. No. 393
|
Scrutiny Committee - Tracking of
Recommendations -
(2) To be reported on a quarterly basis
|
Completed
(E&E
02 Oct 2007)
|
|
|
(3) That, in response to a question relating
to follow-up action requested back in February 2007, an invitation
be extended to representatives of the Consortium and WAG to attend
an early meeting of this Committee to receive an update on progress
in respect of Phase 2 of the Waterfront development and to make
clear the Council's aspirations.
|
Completed
(Date of meeting confirmed
as
12 Feb 07)
|
|
2nd October 2007 - Min. No. 396
|
Defective Private Sewer, The Broadshoard,
Cowbridge
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3361
09 Jan 08)
|
|
13th November 2007 - Min. No.
531
|
Flooding Event in the Vale of Glamorgan on
20th July, 2007
|
Completed
(Min. No. 329
28 Nov 07
The provision of sandbags
subsequently agreed - Min. No. C3342
19 Dec 07)
|
|
4th December 2007 - Min. No.
585
|
Initial Revenue and Capital Programme
Proposals 2008/09 - Additional Budgetary Information
|
Completed
(Endorsed by Scrutiny CR
on 11 Dec 07
Subsequently referred to
Budget Working Group -
Min No. C3333 and
C3334)
|
(2) T H A
T the actions detailed as completed below, and as agreed by
Committee in October 2007 (Min. No. 393), be recorded for the sake
of completeness:
|
17th April 2007 - Min. No. 1014
|
Review of Scrutiny Arrangements -
R (1) Organise a Scrutiny event for
non-executive Members to explore and further develop the
effectiveness of scrutiny
|
Initial action
completed
(02 Oct 07
Min. No. 393)
|
|
17th April 2007 - Min. No. 1015
|
Public Opinion Survey 2006 - Results
|
Completed
(Letter sent
July 07)
|
|
17th April 2007 - Min. No. 1017
|
Knap Lake Shelters Refurbishment
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3005
09 May 07)
|
|
17th April 2007 - Min. No. 1018
|
Welsh Coastal Tourism Strategy
(1) That the comments to the Consultation
Questions in the Welsh Coastal Tourism Strategy, as appended to the
report and as amended/amplified at the meeting, be forwarded to the
WAG as the Council’s response to the strategy document and
(2) That, given the current financial
constraints on the Council, WAG be urged to make available funding
to facilitate the implementation of the strategy
|
Completed
(Response sent Apr/May
07)
Completed
(Letter sent
Apr / May 07)
|
|
17th April 2007 - Min. No. 1020
|
Draft Annual Report May 2006 - April 2007 and
Forward Work Programme for 2007-08
(1) That the draft Annual Report for the
period May 2006 - April 2007 be approved, subject to any further
minor amendments being agreed I consultation with the Chairman, and
that it be submitted to Full Council
|
Completed
(E&E
17 Apr 07)
|
|
|
(2) That consideration of the following
matters continue to form part of the Forward Work Programme:
- quarterly service performance
monitoring
- monthly revenue and capital
monitoring
- initial revenue budget and
initial capital programme proposals
- Improvement Plan
- service planning
- emerging strategies from the
Corporate Plan and Community Strategy
- Local Development Plan
- recycling and waste
management
- Rhoose Point and the impact
thereon of development north of the railway line, Rhoose
|
Completed
(E&E
17 Apr 07)
|
|
|
(3) That “Sustainable Integrated Public
Transport” be included in the Work Programme for 2007-2008
|
Completed
(E&E
17 Apr 07)
|
|
|
(4) That the Scrutiny Committee (Corporate
Resources) be requested to look at sustainability from a corporate
viewpoint.
|
Completed
(Request withdrawn Min.
No. 66
29 May 07)
|
|
17th April 2007 - Min. No. 1022
|
Site of the Former Knap Pool, Barry
(2) That a press release be immediately issued
to inform the public of the current situation and future programme
for the area, and that regular communication be undertaken with the
Knap Community Action Group
(3) That Cabinet be requested to approve the
allocation of £75k. from the Asset Renewal Fund to finance the
initial drainage works, and the works be undertaken in-house
|
Completed
(Min. No. 73
29 May 07)
Completed
(Min. No. C3026
23 May 07)
|
|
17th April 2007 - Min. No. 1023
|
Urban Parks Programme: Victoria Park,
Barry
(1) That the issues in relation to the
contract works as outlined in the report be noted and the measures
taken to investigate matters approved
|
Completed
(E&E
17 Apr 07)
|
|
|
(2) That an application to HLF for uplift
funding be supported
|
Completed
(Min. No. C2986
18 Apr 07)
|
|
|
(3) That Cabinet approval be sought for the
Director of Environmental and Economic Regeneration to authorise
contractual payments
|
Completed
(Min. No. C2986
18 Apr 07)
|
|
|
(4) That a further report be presented to this
Committee on the completion of the internal review of the contract
situation, such a review to include the direct involvement of
Internal Audit
|
Completed
(Min. No. C2986
18 Apr 07)
|
|
|
(5) That the report be referred to the next
Cabinet meeting
|
Completed
(Considered by Cabinet
18 Apr 07)
|
|
22nd May 2007 - Min. No. 33
|
Revenue and Capital Monitoring 1st
April 2007 - 30th April 2007 - Query relating to land
acquisition to facilitate the access road to Dunraven Bay
|
Completed
(Response sent
29 May 07)
|
|
22nd May 2007 - Min. No. 34
|
Implications of the Waste Agenda
(2) That further reports be sent to the
Committee addressing future waste management issues and risks, it
being anticipated that the first of those reports would be
submitted to the meeting in June 2007
|
Completed
(Considered by Scrutiny
Committees (E&E) and (CR)
20 Jun 07 &
24 Jul 07
respectively)
|
|
|
(3) That the report be referred to the
Corporate Management Team and to the Scrutiny Committee (Corporate
Resources) for consideration
|
Completed
(Considered by CMT on
5 Jun 07 &
Scrutiny Committee
(CR)
26 Jun 07 &
24 Jul 07)
|
|
22nd May 2007 - Min. No. 35
|
Knap Slipway - Proposal for the re-opening of
the Slipway for Boating Only (1) That Cabinet be requested to
approve use of the 2007/08 Asset Renewal monies to undertake
repairs to the Knap Slipway
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3063
20 Jun 07)
|
|
|
(2) That Cabinet be requested to authorise the
Director of Environmental and Economic Regeneration in consultation
with the Director of Legal, Public Protection and Housing Services
to agree terms and to grant a Licence to the South Wales
Powerboating Group (SWPG) to manage jointly the operation of the
Knap Slipway for a 12 month period
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3063
20 Jun 07)
|
|
|
(3) That Cabinet be requested to approve the
advertisement of concessions for the joint management of both the
Knap and the Sully Slipways for future seasons on a 3-5 year
basis
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3063
20 Jun 07)
|
|
20th June 2007 - Min. No. 131
|
A Joint Scrutiny of Partnerships in Waste
Management
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3097
4 Jul 07)
|
|
20th June 2007 - Min. No. 132
|
Specific Grant Exposure - Sustainable Waste
Management
(2) That Cabinet be requested to endorse the
Grant expenditure allocated in line with the amounts for 2007/08
and indicative amount from WAG for 2008/09 and 2009/10 as follows
and that further reports be submitted to this Committee in due
course:
- contribution towards funding of
the existing domestic kerbside recycling in the Vale (alternate
weekly Wk1 paper, glass and cans, Wk2 plastic and cardboard) to
100% of properties: £1,039,928
- green waste collection:
£105,494
- funding for Waste Educational
and Awareness Initiatives: £123,000
- contribute towards the cost of
enforcement team covering flytipping, litter and dog fouling:
£50,000
- further development of waste
management options including Phase 1 and 2 of the Waste Resource
Park: £41,000.
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3098
4 Jul 07)
|
|
20th June 2007 - Min. No. 134
|
Tourism Strategy -
(1) That Cabinet be recommended to endorse the
draft Tourism Strategy
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3099
4 Jul 07)
|
|
|
(2) That a consultation event be held with
Members and stakeholders, including representatives of Chambers of
Trade and Town/Community Councils
|
Completed
(Event held
17 Jul 07)
|
|
|
(3) That the report be referred to the
Community Liaison Committee as part of the consultation process
|
Completed
(Min. No. 232
18 Jul 07)
|
|
|
(4) That Cabinet be requested to have regard
to allocating resources to fulfil the promise of the strategy
|
Completed
(Min. No. C3099
4 Jul 07)
|
|
20th June 2007 - Min. No. 136
|
Banners on Bridges
|
Completed
(Min. No C3101
4 Jul 07)
|
|
20th June 2007 - Min. No. 137
|
Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan (LDP)
- Sustainability Appraisal Draft Scoping Report - Results of Public
Consultation
|
Completed
(E&E
20 Jun 07)
|
|
20th June 2007 - Min. No. 139
|
Technical Advice Note (TAN) 18: Transport
|
Completed
(Considered by
T&F Group
25 Sep 07)
|
Reason for recommendation
To maintain effective tracking of the
Committee’s recommendations.
703 TOWN CENTRE TASK
AND FINISH GROUP (CHAIRMAN OF T&FG) -
RECOMMENDED - T H A T consideration of the
report be deferred to allow a progress report on the various
matters contained therein to be submitted and the Chairman of the
Task and Finish Group the opportunity to present the findings of
the Task and Finish Group.