SCRUTINY COMMITTEE (ECONOMY AND
ENVIRONMENT)
MINUTES of a meeting held on 30th
July, 2008.
Present: Councillor C.J. Williams
(Chairman); Councillor Mrs. M. Kelly Owen (Vice-Chairman);
Councillors Ms. M.E. Alexander, J.C. Bird, G. John,
Mrs. S.I. Sharpe, W.C. Vaughan, E.T. Williams and Ms. M.
Wright.
Also present: Councillors A.D. Hampton and N.P. Hodges.
218 APOLOGIES FOR
ABSENCE -
These were received from Councillors R.F.
Curtis and M.R. Wilson.
219 MINUTES -
RECOMMENDED - T H A T the minutes of the
meetings held on 2nd and 14th July, 2008
be approved as a correct record.
220 DECLARATIONS OF
INTEREST -
No declarations were received.
221 SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
PERFORMANCE PANELS (CX) -
The Scrutiny Action Plan included a commitment
to “investigate the feasibility of Member development of specialist
functions within Scrutiny enabling Members to become experts in
certain subjects” (Recommendation R11). The pilot Performance
Panel had been established in November 2007 from the then Scrutiny
Committee (Community Wellbeing and Safety). Building on the
success of the pilot project and positive feedback from Members,
the Scrutiny Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen Group agreed that
Performance Panels should be established for each Scrutiny
Committee.
Having considered the proposal that the
Performance Panels follow the same format as the pilot group with
up to four Members being nominated to participate in each Panel, it
was
RECOMMENDED -
(1) T H A
T a specialist Performance Panel to examine and evaluate
performance information be established to meet on a quarterly
basis.
(2) T H A
T Councillors Ms. M.E. Alexander, G. John, Mrs. M. Kelly Owen and
C.J. Williams be appointed to sit on the Performance Panel, it
being agreed that should Councillor John subsequently decide not to
take up his seat due to other Council commitments, that seat be
assumed by a Member of the Committee from the Conservative
Group.
(3) T H A
T the progress of the Performance Panel be reviewed in twelve
months.
Reasons for recommendations
(1) To
enable the establishment of a Member-led specialist led Performance
Panel for this Committee.
(2&3) To facilitate Panel Members in
developing their skills and expertise to scrutinise and challenge
performance and to foster a culture of shared learning amongst the
Committee.
222 4TH
QUARTER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (DEER) -
(a)
Strategy and Support
The Head of Building and Vehicle Services
presented the end of year statistics in relation to the
above. Of the six PIs listed, it was noted that either a
target had not been set or the service was establishing a baseline
figure in respect of four. The remaining two PIs indicated
that the figure was on target or a better performance had been
achieved than required.
(b)
Building and Vehicle Services (Fleet)
The Head of Building and Vehicle Services also
presented the end of year PIs in relation to that part of the
service which remained within the remit of this Committee. He
explained the reasons behind those PIs where targets had not been
achieved quoting, for example, the reason in the case of the
percentage of large goods vehicles passing the MOT first time not
being met was attributable to the reduced number of vehicles
requiring an MOT since the age profile of the fleet had improved.
In response to a question relating to the high levels of sickness
in the service, he referred to a working group having been
established and an action plan being drawn up. It was
reported that sickness figures would likely be reported to
Committee in September once the figures had been received from
Oracle and Transact.
(c)
Economic Development and Leisure
(d)
Visible Services
The Head of Visible Services drew attention to
the deletion of a number of PIs currently reported and
focussed on those areas where the target was not being met. He
reported that as regards THS009, the average number of days taken
to repair street lamps, this Council was in fact well above the
national average for Wales despite the target not being met and
that public satisfaction levels with the service were high. The
failure to meet the target, however, in respect of the percentage
of municipal waste composted or treated biologically was an issue
which was being specifically concentrated on and it was expected
that the target would be exceeded in the coming year as a
consequence. Reference was made in the course of subsequent
discussion to the considerable achievement of reaching Level 5 of
Green Dragon and the efforts of all staff concerned throughout the
service in producing a creditable set of results.
(e)
Planning and Transportation
RECOMMENDED –
(1) THAT
the officers be thanked for presenting their respective reports and
responding to questions.
(2) THAT,
given the concerns expressed at (c) above, Cabinet be requested to
keep this Committee fully informed at the progress being made in
respect of Leisure Centre management and the services provided.
(3) THAT,
as detailed in the report, the following PIs be deleted: LCS1a;
LCS1b; THS004; WMT001(a)(i)/NS15; WMT001(a)(ii)/NS15;
WMT002(a)(NS16); WMT006; and L450.
223 ANNUAL REPORT:
SECTION 106 LEGAL AGREEMENTS 2007/08 (REF - MIN. NO. C59) -
Cabinet, having considered the annual report
as referred to above, had noted the progress made in relation to
Section 106 matters between April 2007 and March 2008 and had
sought the views of this and the Planning Committee on the
following:
(i) a charging
system for negotiating, implementing and monitoring Section 106
Legal Agreements, known as a Planning Obligations Administration
Fee, be amended to require:
· 2%
of the total financial contribution being sought under the
Agreement; or
·
20% of the planning application fee,
whichever is the greater;
(ii)
the charging system as recommended above be implemented with
immediate effect, with the exception of all Agreements currently
subject to formal resolution and in the process of being
negotiated.
The Head of Planning and Transportation and
the Section 106 Officer together outlined the key features of the
report, referring in the process to the fact that the post of
Section 106 Officer had come about as a direct consequence of a
review on planning obligations conducted by this Committee. A raft
of new procedures had been introduced to ensure an efficient and
effective service to both the Council itself and developers. This
Council was just one of a few in Wales to operate such a dedicated
service.
Section 106 agreements were now being
negotiated in respect of both small- and large-scale developments
and, as detailed in the report, the total financial contribution
sought between April 2007 and March 2008 amounted to approximately
£5.6m. In response to questions, it was explained that
contributions could not reasonably be expected until development
had at least commenced and that payments were often staggered.
Contributions were usually topic based (that is, education,
transportation purposes etc.) and were expended accordingly.
Following further consideration and discussion
on the above and related matters, it was
RECOMMENDED – THAT the officers be thanked for
their presentation and the resolutions of Cabinet as contained in
Minute No. C59 endorsed.