STANDARDS COMMITTEE

 

 

MINUTES of a meeting held on 30th July, 2007.

 

Present: Mr. C.D. Samuel (Chairman); Mr. G. Ellis (Vice-Chairman); Mr. P. Langmaid, Mr. D. Perkins, Councillors Mrs. V.M. Hartrey and Mrs. M. Kelly Owen and Community Councillor A. Pryor.

 

 

276     APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE -

 

These were received from Councillor Mrs. M.E.J. Birch.

 

 

277     MINUTES -

 

RESOLVED - T H A T the minutes of the meeting held on 5th February, 2007 be approved as a correct record.

 

 

278     DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST -

 

No declarations were received.

 

 

279     APPLICATIONS FOR GRANT OF DISPENSATIONS -

 

The Standards Committee (Grant of Dispensations) (Wales) Regulations 2001 permitted Members to apply to the Standards Committee to speak and if appropriate to vote on matters concerning which, due to a personal interest, they might not otherwise be able to speak or vote.

 

RESOLVED - T H A T the dispensations as set out in the schedule overleaf be granted up to the date of the next Local Government elections, as indicated:

 


 

Member requesting dispensation (relevant Authority)

Matter on which dispensation sought

Criteria for seeking dispensation

New or existing

Decision

 

Councillor R.J. Bertin (VoGC)

 

To speak on any matter relating to Cardiff City Transport Services T/A Cardiff Bus in view of his being a paid full-time employee of the Company.

 

1.    No damage to public confidence.

2.    Common interest with general public.

3.    Justified because of special expertise.

4.    Scrutiny Committee business and not financial interest.

 

New

 

Dispensation granted to speak during any debate in connection with Cardiff City Transport Services, trading as Cardiff Bus, with the exception of matters of finance.

 

Councillor B.I. Shaw (VoGC)

 

To speak and vote upon any matter to be considered by the Scrutiny Committee (Lifelong Learning) or the Full Council or Cabinet or any other formal body of the Council (in relation to matters of Lifelong Learning) of a general educational nature, in terms of policy, policy plans, policy frameworks, budgets, documents and reports of a strategic nature, documents and reports of a planning nature (in relation to Lifelong Learning) and documents and reports which aid and support future decisions, and decisions which apply uniformly to all schools or a large sector of them.

 

 

1.    50% of Members affected.

2.    Political balance would be affected.

3.    No damage to public confidence.

4.    Justified because of special expertise.

 

New

 

Dispensation granted to speak and vote upon any matter to be considered by the Scrutiny Committee (Lifelong Learning) or the Full Council or Cabinet or any other formal body of the Council (in relation to matters of Lifelong Learning) of a general educational nature, in terms of policy, policy plans, policy frameworks, budgets, documents and reports of a strategic nature, documents and reports of a planning nature (in relation to Lifelong Learning) and documents and reports which aid and support future decisions, and decisions which apply uniformly to all schools or a large sector of them but not matters relating specifically to the school of which Councillor Shaw is a Governor.

 

Councillor S.C. Egan (VoGC)

 

To speak and vote on matters concerning the business of the Local Health Board with regard to joint planning, policy development and strategy and the efficient delivery of services, but not matters relating directly to the Board, in view of Councillor Egan’s appointment as the Council’s representative.

 

1.    No damage to public confidence.

2.    Justified because of special expertise.

3.    Scrutiny Committee business and not financial interest.

 

New

 

Dispensation granted to speak and vote.

 

Councillor Ms. M.E. Alexander (VoGC)

 

To speak and vote on matters concerning the business of the Local Health Board with regard to joint planning, policy development and strategy and the efficient delivery of services, but not matters relating directly to the Board, in view of Councillor Alexander’s appointment as the Council’s representative.

 

1.    No damage to public confidence.

2.    Justified because of special expertise.

3.    Scrutiny Committee business and not financial interest.

 

New

 

Dispensation granted to speak and vote.

 


 

280     EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC -

 

RESOLVED - T H A T under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part 4 of Schedule 12A (as amended) of the Act, the relevant paragraphs of the Schedule being referred to in brackets after the minute heading.

 

 

281     INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGATIONS OF FAILURE TO OBSERVE THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR MEMBERS (DMO) (EXEMPT INFORMATION - PARAGRAPHS 18A AND 18C) -

 

The Public Services Ombudsman had prepared a report in respect of an investigation into allegations against Councillor S., a member of a Community Council within the Vale of Glamorgan, and a copy was presented to the Standards Committee to enable the Committee to make an initial determination as to whether Councillor S. had failed, or may have failed, to comply with that Community Council’s Code of Conduct.

 

The Ombudsman’s investigation had been in respect of a complaint received on 21st November, 2005 (comprising nine allegations) and a second complaint received on 15th February, 2006 (comprising two allegations).

 

The findings of the Ombudsman’s investigation had been:

 

………………….” in respect of allegations 2,7 and 9 … that there is no evidence of a breach of the code of conduct.  My finding in relation to allegation 6 is that no action is necessary.  My finding in respect of allegations 1,3,4,5 and 8 and in respect of the second batch of allegations is that my report on this investigation should be referred to the Monitoring Officer of the Vale of Glamorgan County Borough Council for consideration by the Standards Committee”.

 

Regulation 7 of the Local Government Investigations (Functions of Monitoring Officers and Standards Committees) (Wales) Regulations 2001, require that, following consideration of the Ombudsman’s report, the Standards Committee must either:

 

·             determine that there was no evidence of any failure to comply with the code of conduct of the relevant authority concerned and must notify any person who is the subject of the investigation, any person who made an allegation which gave rise to the investigation and the Local Commissioner in Wales accordingly; or

 

·             determine that any person who is the subject of the investigation should be given the opportunity to make representations, either orally or in writing in respect of the findings of the investigation and any allegations that he or she has failed, or may have failed, to comply with the relevant authority’s code of conduct.

 

Having considered the report and findings of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales, it was

 

RESOLVED -

 

(1)       T H A T the findings of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales in respect of allegations 2,7 and 9, i.e. ‘that there is no evidence of a breach of the Code of Conduct’ be endorsed.

 

(2)       T H A T the findings of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales of allegation 6, i.e. ‘that no action is necessary’ be endorsed.

 

(3)       T H A T in respect of the findings of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales regarding allegations 1,3,4,5 and 8, and in respect of the second batch of allegations, Councillor S. be given the opportunity to make representations either orally or in writing before a further meeting of the Standards Committee and that the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales’ Investigating Officer be also invited to attend the meeting.

 

Reasons for decisions

 

To comply with the provisions of the 2001 Regulations.