Agenda Item No.
VALE OF GLAMORGAN
LOCAL ACCESS FORUM
MINUTES of a meeting held at the Cory
Education Centre, Dyffryn Gardens on 8th May, 2007.
Present: Mr. M.R. Harvey (Chairman); Mr. D.J.
Field (Deputy Chairman);
Mr. J.V. Custance, Mrs. V.M. Hartrey, Mr. J.J.
Herbert, Mrs. H. March, Mr. H.S. McMillan, Mrs. M.
Morgan, Mr. N. Moss, Mr. R. Pittard, Mr. R. Simpson,
Mr. R. Traherne and Mrs. V. Warlow.
Mr. J. Wyatt (Secretary); Mr. F. Coleman, Mr.
C. Fray and Mr. C. Jones Jenkins (VOGC).
(a)
Apologies for absence -
These were received from Mr D.T. Hopkin, Mr.
D. Williams and Councillor G. John (Cabinet Member, Leisure
and Tourism).
(b)
Minutes -
AGREED - T H A T the minutes of the meeting
held on 21st February, 2007 be approved as a correct
record subject to the following insertion in the second sentence of
the penultimate paragraph of Minute No. (f) after the reference to
Mr Custance: “as British Mountaineering Council Access
representative for South East Wales.”
(c)
Report on Draft ROWIP Consultation -
The three month consultation period for the
draft ROWIP had ended on 10th April, 2007.
Distribution and advertising had been undertaken in accordance with
the CRoW Act and Welsh Assembly Government Guidance. Twenty
one responses had been received, with the issues raised in those
responses summarised in a report to the Forum under the following
headings:
§
Compliments / support for the document
§
Partnerships
§
Resources
§
Strategic context
§
Network composition
§
Network maintenance / installation choices
§
Document format
§
Document format with specific regard to the Definitive Map /
Ordnance Survey Map.
Generally, a very positive response had been
received, particularly for the idea of partnership development,
especially from Town and Community Councils.
In addition to the above, the Countryside
Council for Wales had also submitted an extremely useful response,
which was again included in the information considered by the
Forum. Certain of the points raised by CCW were accepted and
the document would be reviewed / amended accordingly.
Particular reference was made in the course of the subsequent
discussion to the Strategic Environmental (SEA) Directive and to
the fact that the Council should consider whether or not the ROWIP
should be screened under SEA to avoid any potential future
challenge. It was queried at the meeting as to whether the
Environment Agency and the Forestry Commission had commented about
the issue of the SEA, and agreed that officers would
investigate. Discussion also took place on the desirability
of including aspirational targets within the ROWIP - qualified as
necessary by practical issues such as e.g. the availability of
funding / resources. Members were requested to submit any
suggestions to the PROW Section within a month. The final
draft document would then be presented to the LAF in September for
comment.
AGREED - T H A T the changes suggested by the
Public Rights of Way Team and those comments accepted from CCW be
agreed and incorporated in the document, together with any further
suggestions from the LAF, for final consideration at the September
meeting.
(d)
Guidance issued under Sections 147 and 147ZA of the Highways Act
1980 relating to the requirement for local authorities to have
regard to the needs of people with mobility problems when
authorising stiles and gates -
The Forum received for information a copy of
the above statutory guidance issued by the Welsh Assembly
Government. The WAG advised that local authorities, before
authorising a new barrier under Section 147, should be satisfied on
the following three counts:
·
that the land was being used, or was being brought into use, for
agriculture, forestry or for the breeding or keeping of horses;
·
that, in order for that use to be carried on efficiently, it was
expedient for a structure to be erected on the path or way that
crossed the land to prevent the ingress or egress of animals;
and
·
that the barrier being authorised was the least restrictive barrier
that was consistent with the need to contain or exclude
animals.
Discussion then ensued on the needs of
landowners given the specific situation within the Vale which
housed a diverse and increasing number of landowners and farmers,
both large and small scale. Reference was, however, made to
the fact that efforts had been made to address that matter within
the draft ROWIP in that, whilst looking at gap, gate, stile in that
order the Council recognised the need to consult with and gain
agreement from landowners and to work within what was statutory
guidance and could not therefore be ignored. The drawing of
attention to the following publications, as alluded to in the
guidance, was also noted: “By All Reasonable Means: Inclusive
Access to the Outdoors for Disabled People”; and Countryside for
All Good Practice Guide, extended CD edition, published by the
Fieldfare Trust in 2005.
AGREED – T H A T the aforementioned statutory
guidance be noted together with the revised entry within the draft
ROWIP referred to above.
(e) “Let’s
Walk Cymru”: Guidance Note -
“Let’s Walk Cymru” was a new Wales-wide
initiative (promoted through Sports Council Wales and supported by
WAG and CCW) tasked with increasing the number of people
undertaking walking as a regular health benefiting activity.
The initiative would support existing physical activity projects as
long as they showed additional features in their application for
assistance illustrating an extension of the project to include
different people, areas or activities.
The Guidance Note submitted to the Forum set
out details of the following:
§
categories of projects which would be funded;
§
eligibility;
§
what a grant could / could not be used for;
§
details of the amount of grant available (i.e. of up to £10k. per
annum);
§
timescale.
It was explained that despite the above not
being a core issue for the PROW Section, ways of promoting the
initiative (in partnership or unilaterally) were being
discussed. An example given was the production of walking
leaflets based on the Country Parks in the Vale. Reference
was also made during subsequent discussion to the success of the
Walking the Way to Health model and Mrs. Warlow, who was involved
in the initiative through Valewaves, agreed to keep the LAF
informed of new developments in that area.
AGREED – T H A T the position be noted.
(f)
Update on Coastal Access Improvement Programme -
Consideration had been given at the last
meeting to a draft outline Coastal Access Improvement Programme
(CAIP). The draft document had now been amended in the light
of comments received, investigation into potential schemes and
further guidance from the Countryside Council for Wales.
Consideration was given to the revised
document, within which the initiatives proposed were grouped into
three themes:
§
Practical Improvements;
§
Investigative Work;
§
Negotiation and Management.
Each of the proposals would contribute
significantly to improving coastal access and would demonstrate to
be in accordance with the priorities given in the Wales Coastal
Access Improvement Programme. More local priorities, based on
the workshop session held at the last meeting of the Forum, would
be more appropriate to carry forward into the full CIAP document to
be prepared later in the year. Subsequent discussion referred
to the practicalities of acquiring the land necessary to replace
lost sections of path, which would be dependant upon the level of
grant awarded. It was noted that an optimistic total bid of
£177k. had been submitted.
It was understood that officers from the
Countryside Council for Wales were meeting on 8th May,
2007 to review all the Local Authority Coastal Access Programme
bids, with the outcome of the bids to be made known as soon as
possible.
AGREED - T H A T the revised draft Outline
Coastal Access Improvement Programme be endorsed.
(g)
Membership of Coastal Access Advisory Group -
The Wales Coastal Access Improvement Programme
guidance required the establishment of a partnership to progress
the Vale of Glamorgan Coastal Access Improvement Programme.
At the last meeting, it had been suggested that a Vale of Glamorgan
Coastal Access Advisory Group could be formed from a core of,
perhaps, six Forum members, together with a representative from
selected organisations, to provide a strategic advisory group and
sounding board for coastal access issues. The suggested
organisations were the Country Landowners and Business Association,
the National Farmers Union, the Farmers Union of Wales, the
Environment Agency, the Vale Marketing Group (representing tourism
interests) and the Cardiff and Vale Coalition of Disabled
People. Initial contact had already been made with most of
these organisations.
In addition to the above, direct consultation
would need to involve other sections within the Council, specific
landowners, user groups and Community Councils. It might be
appropriate to have a wider partnership meeting on an annual basis
to discuss issues and progress on the CIAP.
The Advisory Group would be facilitated in a
similar way to the Local Access Forum, with its proceedings being
reported on to the Forum and the Council’s Scrutiny Committee
(Economy and Environment) and / or Cabinet as appropriate.
AGREED -
(1) T H A
T the establishment of a Coastal Access Advisory Group as a
sub-group of the Local Access Forum be endorsed, to form part of a
core of a wider Vale of Glamorgan partnership to help progress
coastal access initiatives.
(2) T H A
T the following members of the Forum be nominated to serve on the
Coastal Access Advisory Group:
Mrs. V.M. Hartrey, Mr. J.J. Herbert, Mrs. H. March,
Mr. H.S. McMillan and Mr. R.
Simpson.
(3) T H A
T any other member wishing to serve on the Group notify the
Secretary by 11th May, 2007.
(h)
Local Access Forum Volunteers’ Performance Indicator Survey: August
2006 -
By way of background it was explained that the
Performance Indicator for Public Rights of Way asked for the
percentage of total lengths of rights of way which were easy to use
by members of the public in order to measure trends and
progress. Guidance currently recommended a survey of a
minimum of 5% of the length of the network each year to achieve the
desired result. Since commencement in 1997, the surveys had
been carried out each Spring by volunteers from members of the two
Ramblers’ Association groups in the Vale. It was noted that
the individuals carrying out the surveys had largely remained the
same throughout the 10 year period. The continuity achieved
as a consequence had been taken as an indicator that any apparently
random swings in results (as evidenced in the graph appended to the
report) could not be put down to different surveyors being employed
in different years. Instead, it was considered that the
apparent swings were the result of 5% being too small a percentage
for the length of path in the Vale and efforts had been made to
increase the size of the survey from a minimum 5% to 10% each
year. This opportunity arose in 2006 when seven members of
the LAF volunteered to undertake the surveys. A further
minimum 5% random sample of the PROW was then generated and split
seven ways. Six of the seven volunteers completed the task
and the results therefore were derived from 4.61% survey as opposed
to the recommended minimum 5%. The surveys had been carried
out in August / September 2006 and showed an overall 50.7% pass
rate. In the Spring of 2007 the next regular survey had been
undertaken by the Ramblers’ Association groups and the result
submitted to WAG as the current year’s PI return. It was
noted that the Summer LAF result had been significantly below that
measured by the Ramblers in the Spring and, accordingly, the LAF
result would be recorded only internally alongside the Ramblers’
Association returns for the immediate future to allow trends and
consistency to become apparent.
Those surveying indicated that many of the
footpaths had failed to meet requirements because of the lack of
way-marking and signposting and suggested that an action plan
should be drawn up to rectify that position. In response, it
was pointed out that the purpose of the survey was to identify
trends and that a planned programme of maintenance work was drawn
up. That programme concentrated in the main on those paths
most used / closest to centres of habitation etc. and the diversion
of severely limited resources to bring the paths subject to the
survey up to standard would be an inappropriate use of those
resources. It was, however, accepted that those undertaking
the survey should be permitted to install way-markers as part of
their remit where required. It was also reported that
the WLGA proposed changes to the way in which the PI in question
was undertaken and a report requested on the same for consideration
at the next meeting. Other potential new footpaths PIs were
also being mooted and a further report would be submitted to a
future meeting once that information had been received.
AGREED –
(1) T H A
T a similar exercise to that undertaken in Autumn 2006 and Spring
2007 be carried out in the late Summer / Autumn 2007 with a view to
completing a regular PI survey every year to supplement the Spring
5% return and to moving towards incorporation into Action 10 of the
ROWIP which sought a 10% annual sample survey.
(2) T H A
T volunteers to undertake the survey be asked to forward their
names to the PROW
Section.
(i)
Countryside Council for Wales / Welsh Assembly Government Work
Plans for 2007/08 -
CCW and WAG anticipated that they would refer
the following matters to LAFs during the year although they had
made the point that the list was for guidance only and might change
to reflect work priorities.
AGREET – T H A T the list as shown below be
included in the Forum’s Annual Report 2006/07 as reflecting its
programme for 2007/08 onwards:
The following are matters that CCW & WAG
anticipate that they will refer to LAFs during the year. This is
for guidance only and may change to reflect work priorities.
It should not be taken as definitive. In addition
Local Authorities and National Park authorities will refer matters
to LAFs. LAF members themselves should also be encouraged to put
forward agenda items.
|
Referred by
|
Approx Timing
|
Nature of Referral
|
Which LAFs?
|
|
Coastal Access Programme
|
CCW/WAG
|
From April 07
|
Work with coastal local authorities and the
two national parks on looking at where improvements can be made at
the coast
|
Those with coastal areas
|
|
Access to Inland Water
|
CCW/WAG
|
From April 07
|
Advise on aspects relating to access to
water
|
All
|
|
Exclusions & Restrictions on Access
Land
|
CCW
|
Autumn 2007
|
Consultation on review of relevant authority
guidance.
|
All
|
|
Off-roading
|
CCW/WAG
|
Summer/autumn 2007
|
Advise on aspects of the provision of sites
pilots to be undertaken by CCW in partnership with local
authorities.
|
All – though the pilots will not cover all
authorities it would be beneficial to have input from each LAF as
this is a chance for a nation-wide solution to a growing
problem.
|
|
|
WAG
|
Autumn 2007
|
|
All
|
(j) Local Access
Forum Annual Report 2006/07 -
The content of the Annual Report was commended
and would, following suggestions from the floor, be enhanced by the
inclusion of suitable photographs prior to its publication.
Members were requested to submit any further suggested amendments
to the text by 11th May, 2007. The final document
would be made available on the Council’s website and in hard copy
at the Council’s offices. Copies would also be sent to all
Town and Community Councils.
AGREED - T H A T the draft Annual Report be
endorsed for publication.
(k)
Dates of future meetings -
AGREED - T H A T meetings be held as follows
(all meetings to commence at 18:00):
19th September, 2007
16th January, 2008
14th May, 2008.
(l)
Publications -
Mr. Custance provided copies of a book
published by the South Wales Mountaineering Club – which contained
references to climbs in the Bridgend area – for members’
perusal.
Mrs. March drew attention to a recently
published book entitled “Penllyn” which had been produced by the
villagers themselves.
(m) Frank
Coleman -
The Chairman referred to the imminent
retirement of Mr. Coleman and to his tireless work on behalf of the
LAF. Members on the LAF joined the Chairman in wishing him a
happy, healthy and long retirement.