AUDIT COMMITTEE
Minutes of a meeting held on 24th
September, 2009.
Present: Councillor A.C. Williams
(Chairman); Councillor J. Clifford (Vice-Chairman);
Councillors J.F. Fraser, N. Moore and C.L. Osborne.
Also present: Ms. C. Thomas (Grant
Thornton UK LLP).
384 APOLOGIES FOR
ABSENCE -
These were received from Councillor K. Hatton
and Mr J. Golding (Grant Thornton UK LLP).
385 MINUTES -
RESOLVED - T H A T the minutes of the meeting
held on 10th June, 2009 be approved as a correct
record.
386 DECLARATIONS OF
INTEREST -
No declarations were received.
387 IFRS
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE (DFICTP) -
The Committee was provided with an update on
the latest position regarding the implications of the introduction
of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
The annual financial statements of government departments and other
entities in the public sector were currently prepared using
accounting policies based on UK Generally Accepted Accounting
Practice (UK GAAP). However, from 2010/11 financial
statements would need to be prepared using IFRS, and in order to
achieve this, comparative data would be required for 2009/10.
CIPFA had produced a draft code and
consultation was currently being undertaken. The final code
was expected to be issued in Autumn 2009. Work had already
been undertaken by the authority in relation to the major areas of
change and progress had to date been made in the following areas
leasing, component accounting, employment benefits and segmental
reporting.
In respect of leasing arrangements, the method
for classifying leases into “operating” or “finance” needed to be
reviewed to ensure the correct classification. In order to
achieve this all departments, including schools, had been asked to
provide details of the lease agreements that they had arranged
relating to equipment. With regard to component accounting,
the IFRS required that the different elements of an asset were to
be depreciated separately if they were significant in relation to
the total cost of the asset. A re-evaluation of assets due to
be undertaken in 2009/10 would be considered for component
valuation although it was not a requirement under existing
rules. For employment benefits there would be a requirement
to accrue for holiday pay earned, including flexi and time in lieu,
but not yet taken as at 31st March each year.
This was complicated for the Vale of Glamorgan as some departments
had staggered leave years. Most school based staff also did
not have a flexible annual leave entitlement and were only able to
take leave during the school holidays. To this end a specific
formula had been agreed by CIPFA to calculate the leave accrual for
these staff. For other employees a sample of 10% of whole
time equivalents from across the Authority had been asked to
provide relevant information regarding their annual leave. To
date 191 replies had been received from 197 questionnaires
issued. The officer presenting the report advised Members
that they had been most pleased with the responses from staff and
the co-operation that had been afforded to the questionnaire
completion.
IFRS also required there be increased
disclosure in the notes of the accounts to provide information on
reportable segments based on the Authority’s internal
reporting. Having reviewed the format of financial
information provided to the Cabinet it had been considered that the
segments that could be used be based on directorates with smaller
directorates being amalgamated. Following completion of the
work that had already been undertaken and outlined above, the
opening 2009/10 balance sheet would be restated to an IFRS
basis. The Authority’s financial statements would also need
to be reviewed as the 2010/11 accounts would have to be presented
in a different format with additional notes and
disclosures.
The report also highlighted that there was a
proposal that an All Wales Chief Accountants Group be set up in
order that officers could discuss issues and share
experiences. Throughout the implementation discussions would
also continue to be held with the Authority’s external auditors.
During discussion of the report Members queried the expiry date for
the lease of Hen Goleg and the officer advised that they would
confirm the details and e-mail all Members with the up to date
position.
Having considered the report it was
RESOLVED -
(1) T H A
T the contents of the report be noted.
(2) T H A
T a further update on IFRS implementation report be presented at an
appropriate time in the future.
Reasons for decisions
(1&2) To ensure issues relating to
the changes in accounting practice were highlighted to the Audit
Committee.
388 AUDIT OF THE
2008/09 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - REPORTING TO THOSE CHARGED WITH
GOVERNANCE (DFICTP) -
The Council was responsible for the
preparation of Financial Statements that present fairly its
financial position as at 31st March 2009 and Grant
Thornton UK LLP were the Council’s external auditors and were
responsible for reporting whether, in their opinion, this was the
case. Attached as an appendix, was the Wales Audit Office
report which had been prepared by the external auditors following
the audit of the Council’s Financial Statements for 2008/09.
The Council’s draft Statement of Accounts for 2008/09 had been
reported to Council on 30th June 2009 and with the audit
of these Financial Statements now substantially completed, a report
detailing the key matters arising from the audit had to be reported
in accordance with the International Standard on Auditing (ISA
260). The Audit Committee represented the appropriate body to
which the report must be communicated. The provisional
findings of Grant Thornton were noted as:
· "There were
no concerns with the qualitative aspects of the Council's
accounting practices and financial reporting;
· There were
three uncorrected misstatements (none of which are deemed to be
material in nature);
· There were
no expected modifications to the standard auditor's report;
· The audit
did not identify any material weaknesses in internal control;
· There were
no other matters which need to be reported as required by other
ISAs; and
· There were
no other significant audit matters of governance interest to
report."
Claire Thomas, representing Grant Thornton,
presented the findings to the Committee. During consideration
of the report attention was drawn to three uncorrected
misstatements, in particular the Fire Authority's balances.
The report stated that the Council had not recognised the income
due back from the South Wales Fire and Rescue Authority as a result
of unspent contributions that had built up over prior
periods. The report stated that the adjustment in the
Council’s accounts should therefore be Debtors £745,705 and
Creditors £745,705 to recognise the liability owed to the Council
from the South Wales Fire and Rescue Authority. However,
recent advice from the Welsh Assembly Government had indicated that
new regulations were soon to be agreed for the end of 2009 which
would allow Fire Authorities to hold reserves in their
accounts. To this end the Auditor considered that the issue
was not a material concern and accepted the Council’s
response. The Auditor considered that the other two
misstatements were not material to the Financial Statements but
that they were obliged to report them to the Committee.
Appendix C to the report advised on a summary of corrections to
accounting statements and detailed the reasons for the corrections
which had been accepted by the departments for future
statements.
Having considered the report, it was
RESOLVED - T H A T the report of Grant
Thornton UK LLP on the audit of the Council’s Financial Statements
for 2008/09 be approved and the Financial Statements, including the
final Letter of Representation, be recommended for signature by
those authorised to do so.
Reason for decision
To ensure that those charged with governance
had considered the results of the audit of the Council’s Financial
Statements for 2008/09 and approved the documents.
389 INTERNAL AUDIT
OUTTURN REPORT - APRIL TO AUGUST 2009 (HARM) -
The purpose of the report was to inform the
Committee of the actual Internal Audit performance against the
2009/10 Plan for the period 1st April 2009 to
31st August 2009. The 2009/10 Internal Audit
Operational Plan had been submitted to the Audit Committee for
approval on 10th June 2009 (Minute No. 90). The
Plan had outlined the assignments to be carried out, their
respective priorities, an estimate of resources required and
differentiated between those assurance and other work. The
actual position for April 2009 to August 2009 compared against the
Plan was detailed at Appendices A and B to the report. The
following table detailed an analysis of work that had been done in
relation to both the original and revised Plan days:
|
Work Area
|
2009-10
Full
Year
Plan
Days
|
Proportion of
available days April 09 to Aug 09
|
2009 -
April to August 09
Actual
Days
|
|
Assurance
|
1,165
|
485
|
402
|
|
Efficiencies
|
90
|
38
|
32
|
|
Anti-Fraud & Corruption
|
555
|
231
|
434
|
|
Governance
|
215
|
90
|
47
|
|
Performance Management
|
135
|
56
|
117
|
|
Risk Management
|
364
|
152
|
111
|
|
Unplanned
|
156
|
65
|
79
|
|
Value for Money
|
465
|
194
|
27
|
|
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE DAYS
|
3,145
|
1,311
|
1,249
|
|
Audit Overheads
|
1,275
|
531
|
478
|
|
TOTAL
|
4,420
|
1,842
|
1,727
|
Appendix C to the report detailed the work
that had been carried out during the first 5 months of the
financial year and provided Members with details of a high level
overview of audits that had been completed to date under each of
the following categories - Assurance, Governance, Performance and
Risk Management work, Value for Money and Anti Fraud and Corruption
work.
Members were also advised that at the
completion of all the audits all recipients of reports are asked to
comment on their satisfaction with the audit process by way of a
survey questionnaire. The survey results received had been
excellent and the section hoped to sustain the same level of
customer satisfaction throughout the remainder of the year.
Members were also advised of the number of internal investigations
that the section had been involved in and the Head of Service
advised that the section had spent a considerable amount of time on
governance issues during the year with the result of at least 1
full time equivalent being involved on the project. It was
now opportune for further work to be undertaken to involve Members,
other senior officers, partners and members of the public in round
the table discussions. To this end the Head of Service
suggested that a small working group be established by the Chairman
of the Committee to deal with these matters and that a further
report on the outcome would be presented to the Committee in due
course. Members were also further apprised of the progress
that had been made to date on three initiatives as detailed below
which had been raised in the last Governance Statement:
·
Communities First - Progress in relation to winding up the existing
partnership was slow. A task group had been set up to look at
a new partnership for this project.
·
Management of Capital Projects - A report was due to be presented
to Cabinet and the Scrutiny Committee (Corporate Resources) on a
revised methodology for project management initiatives.
·
NSPCC Action Plan - Various aspects of the Plan had been completed
and the CSSIW were due to visit the Council to undertake a review
of the Plan.
Having considered the report it was
RESOLVED - T H A T the report on actual internal
audit performance during the five months of the financial year be
accepted.
Reason for decision
To facilitate monitoring of the audit
function.